Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum stress tensor in the three-dimensional black hole

Steif, Alan R.·1994·Physical Review D

Abstract

The quantum stress tensor 〈${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\nu}}$〉 is calculated in the (2+1)-dimensional black hole found by Banados, Teitelboim, and Zanelli. The Green's function, from which 〈${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\nu}}$〉 is derived, is obtained by the method of images. For the nonrotating black hole, it is shown that 〈${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\nu}}$〉 is finite on the event horizon, but diverges at the singularity. For the rotating solution, the stress tensor is finite at the outer horizon, but diverges near the inner horizon. This suggests that the inner horizon is quantum mechanically unstable against the formation of a singularity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.49.r585

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rotating and charged holographic quantum black holes do not match the non-holographic perturbatively-corrected counterparts.

    “The rotating and charged holographic quantum black holes, meanwhile, do not match to the non-holographic perturbatively-corrected counterparts (cf.[27,40,45]).”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. M. Banados, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 1849, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1849 · DOI · Paper page
  2. M. Banados, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 1506, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506 · DOI · Paper page
  3. S. F. Ross, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 3319, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3319 · DOI
  4. G. T. Horowitz, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 328, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.328 · DOI
  5. N. Kaloper, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 2598, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2598 · DOI
  6. A. Achucarro, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 3600, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3600 · DOI · Paper page
  7. D. Cangemi, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 3606, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3606 · DOI
  8. C. Farina, 1993, Class. Quantum Grav., 10, L193, 10.1088/0264-9381/10/11/001 · DOI
  9. J. Harvey, 1993, Proceedings of TASI-92, Boulder, Colorado, 1992
  10. M. Simpson, 1973, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 7, 183, 10.1007/BF00792069 · DOI · Paper page
  11. J. McNamara, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A358, 499, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0024 · DOI
  12. R. Matzner, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 2821, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2821 · DOI
  13. N. Zamorano, 1982, Phys. Rev. D, 26, 2564, 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.2564 · DOI
  14. S. Chandrasekhar, 1982, Proc. R. Soc. London, A384, 301, 10.1098/rspa.1982.0160 · DOI
  15. W. Hiscock, 1981, Phys. Lett., 83A, 110, 10.1016/0375-9601(81)90508-9 · DOI
  16. E. Poisson, 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 41, 1796, 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1796 · DOI · Paper page
  17. A. Ori, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 789, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.789 · DOI
  18. A. Ori, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 2117, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2117 · DOI
  19. W. Hiscock, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 3054, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.3054 · DOI
  20. N. Birrell, 1978, Nature (London), 272, 35, 10.1038/272035a0 · DOI
  21. R. Balbinot, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 13, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.13 · DOI
  22. W. Anderson, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 1041, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1041 · DOI
  23. W. Israel, 1993, Directions in General Relativity
  24. S. Deser, 1984, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 152, 220, 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-X · DOI · Paper page
  25. S. Deser, 1984, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 153, 405, 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90025-3 · DOI · Paper page
  26. S. W. Hawking, 1973, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, 10.1017/CBO9780511524646 · DOI · Paper page
  27. S. Avis, 1978, Phys. Rev. D, 18, 3565, 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3565 · DOI
  28. K. Howard, 1984, Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, 403, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.403 · DOI
  29. K. Howard, 1984, Phys. Rev. D, 30, 2532, 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.2532 · DOI
  30. W. Hiscock, 1982, Phys. Rev. D, 26, 1225, 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1225 · DOI
  31. J. Grant, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 2388, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2388 · DOI
  32. S.-W. Kim, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 3929, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3929 · DOI
  33. B. O'Neill, 1983, Semi-Riemannian Geometry

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Steif, A. R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1994-01-15
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
R585-R589
ISSN
0556-2821
Cited by
74
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review