Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical equivalence between nonlinear gravity theories and a general-relativistic self-gravitating scalar field

Open access
Magnano, Guido, Sokołowski, Leszek M.·1994·Physical Review D

Abstract

We argue that in a nonlinear gravity theory (the Lagrangian being an arbitrary function of the curvature scalar R), which according to well-known results is dynamically equivalent to a self-gravitating scalar field in general relativity, the true physical variables are exactly those which describe the equivalent general-relativistic model (these variables are known as the Einstein frame). Whenever such variables cannot be defined, there are strong indications that the original theory is unphysical, in the sense that Minkowski space is unstable due to the existence of negative-energy solutions close to it. To this aim we first clarify the global net of relationships between the nonlinear gravity theories, scalar-tensor theories, and general relativity, showing that in a sense these are ``canonically conjugated'' to each other. We stress that the isomorphisms are in most cases local; in the regions where these are defined, we explicitly show how to map, in the presence of matter, the Jordan frame to the Einstein one and vice versa. We study energetics for asymptotically flat solutions for those Lagrangians which admit conformal rescaling to the Einstein frame in the vicinity of flat space. This is based on the second-order dynamics obtained, without changing the metric, by the use of a Helmholtz Lagrangian. We prove for a large class of these Lagrangians that the ADM energy is positive for solutions close to flat space, and this is determined by the lowest-order terms R+${\mathit{aR}}^{2}$ in the Lagrangian. The proof of this positive-energy theorem relies on the existence of the Einstein frame, since in the (Helmholtz-)Jordan frame the dominant energy condition does not hold and the field variables are unrelated to the total energy of the system. This is why we regard the Jordan frame as unphysical, while the Einstein frame is physical and reveals the physical contents of the theory. The latter should hence be viewed as physically equivalent to a self-interacting general-relativistic scalar field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.50.5039

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Magnano, G., & Sokołowski, L. M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1994-10-15
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
5039-5059
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1504608720
Cited by
426
References
4
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical equivalence between nonlinear gravity theories and a general-relativistic self-gravitating scalar field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.50.5039
The paper
Magnano, G., & Sokołowski, L. M. (1994). Physical equivalence between nonlinear gravity theories and a general-relativistic self-gravitating scalar field. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.50.5039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.