The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries
Open accessAbstract
Observations of gravitational waves from inspiralling compact binaries using laser-interferometric detectors can provide accurate measures of parameters of the source. They can also constrain alternative gravitation theories. We analyze inspiralling compact binaries in the context of the scalar-tensor theory of Jordan, Fierz, Brans, and Dicke, focusing on the effect on the inspiral of energy lost to dipole gravitational radiation, whose source is the gravitational self-binding energy of the inspiralling bodies. Using a matched-filter analysis we obtain a bound on the coupling constant ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{\mathrm{BD}}$ of Brans-Dicke theory. For a neutron-star--black-hole binary, we find that the bound could exceed the current bound of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{\mathrm{BD}}$>500 from solar-system experiments, for sufficiently low-mass systems. For a 0.7${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}}$ neutron star and a 3${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}}$ black hole we find that a bound ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{\mathrm{BD}}$\ensuremath{\approxeq}2000 is achievable. The bound decreases with increasing black-hole mass. For binaries consisting of two neutron stars, the bound is less than 500 unless the stars' masses differ by more than about 0.5${\mathit{M}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}}$. For two black holes, the behavior of the inspiralling binary is observationally indistinguishable from its behavior in general relativity. These bounds assume reasonable neutron-star equations of state and a detector signal-to-noise ratio of 10.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Black holes in the Brans-Dicke: Theory of gravitation
Hawking, S. W. (1972) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01877518 · Cited by 433
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Self-citationTheory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Self-citationThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-4 · Cited by 523
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Will, C. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-11-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6058-6067
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118237158
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.50.6058
- The paper
- Will, C. M. (1994). Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.50.6058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.