The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward understanding CMB anisotropies and their implications
Open accessAbstract
Working toward a model-independent understanding of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies and their significance, we undertake a comprehensive and self-contained study of scalar perturbation theory. Initial conditions, evolution, thermal history, matter content, background dynamics, and geometry all play a role in determining the anisotropy. By employing analytic techniques to illuminate the numerical results, we are able to separate and identify each contribution. We thus bring out the nature of the total Sachs-Wolfe effect, acoustic oscillations, diffusion damping, Doppler shifts, and reionization, as well as their particular manifestation in a critical curvature, or cosmological-constant-dominated universe. By studying the full angular and spatial content of the resultant fluctuations, we isolate the signature of these effects from the dependence on initial conditions. Whereas structure in the Sachs-Wolfe anisotropy depends strongly on the underlying power spectra, the acoustic oscillations provide features which are nearly model independent. This may allow for future determination of the matter content of the Universe as well as the adiabatic and/or isocurvature nature of the initial fluctuations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background
Sachs, R. K., & Wolfe, A. M. (1967) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/148982 · Cited by 1,815
Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology
Harrison, E. R. (1970) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.1.2726 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Magnetic fields in the early Universe
Grasso, D., & Rubinstein, H. R. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00110-1 · Cited by 1,037
Statistics of cosmic microwave background polarization
Kamionkowski, M., Kosowsky, A., & Stebbins, A. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.7368 · Cited by 1,012
Small‐Scale Cosmological Perturbations: An Analytic Approach
Hu, W., & Sugiyama, N. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177989 · Cited by 951
Self-citationCMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition
Abazajian, K. N., & CMB-S4 Collaboration (2016) · doi:10.2172/1352047 · Cited by 434
Big-bang nucleosynthesis enters the precision era
Schramm, D. N., & Turner, M. S. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.303 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, W., & Sugiyama, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-03-15
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2599-2630
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153607007
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward understanding CMB anisotropies and their implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.51.2599
- The paper
- Hu, W., & Sugiyama, N. (1995). Toward understanding CMB anisotropies and their implications. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.51.2599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.