Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes

Bekenstein, Jacob D.·1995·Physical Review D

Abstract

We formulate a new ``no-hair'' theorem for black holes in general relativity which rules out a multicomponent scalar field dressing of any asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric black hole. The field is assumed to be minimally coupled to gravity, and to bear a non-negative energy density as seen by any observer, but its field Lagrangian need not be quadratic in the field derivatives. The proof centers on energy-momentum conservation and the Einstein equations. One kind of field ruled out is the Higgs field with a double (or multiple) well potential. The theorem is also proved for scalar-tensor gravity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.51.r6608

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Bekenstein, J. D.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1995-06-15
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
R6608-R6611
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975566581
Cited by
428
References
0
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.51.r6608
The paper
Bekenstein, J. D. (1995). Novel ‘‘no-scalar-hair’’ theorem for black holes. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.51.r6608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.