Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of three-dimensional gravitational waves: Harmonic slicing case

Shibata, Masaru, Nakamura, Takashi·1995·Physical Review D

Abstract

We perform numerical simulations of a three-dimensional (3D) time evolution of pure gravitational waves. We use a conformally flat and K=0 initial condition for the evolution of the spacetime. We adopt several slicing conditions to check whether a long time integration is possible in those conditions. For the case in which the amplitude of the gravitational waves is low, a long time integration is possible by using the harmonic slice and the maximal slice, while in the geodesic slice (\ensuremath{\alpha}=1) it is not possible. As in the axisymmetric case and also in the 3D case, gravitational waves with a sufficiently high amplitude collapse by their self-gravity and their final fates seem to be as black holes. In this case, the singularity avoidance property of the harmonic slice seems weak, so that it may be inappropriate for the formation problems of the black hole. By means of the gauge-invariant wave extraction technique we compute the waveform of the gravitational waves at an outer region. We find that the nonlinearity of Einstein gravity induces the higher multipole modes even if only a quadrupole mode exists initially.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.52.5428

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,250

Metadata

Authors
Shibata, M., & Nakamura, T.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1995-11-15
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
5428-5444
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2179614604
Cited by
1,250
References
15
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.