Cited by 19Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Real alternative to quantum gravity in loop space

Open access
Loll, R.·1996·Physical Review D

Abstract

We show that the Hamiltonian constraint of four-dimensional Lorentzian gravity, defined on a space of real, SU(2)-valued connections, in spite of its nonpolynomiality possesses a natural quantum analogue in a lattice-discretized formulation of the theory. This opens the way for a systematic search of its zero eigenvectors. The unambiguous and well-defined kinematical scalar product is that of the SU(2)-gauge theory. We also comment on various aspects of the continuum theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.54.5381

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical and mathematical arguments indicate that this representation is relevant at the diffeomorphism-invariant and background-independent level.

    “But physical and mathematical arguments indicate that this representation is relevant at the diffeomorphism-invariant and background-independent level [6,7].”

    From Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity (1998) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6][6] S. Holst: Barbero's Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action, Stockholm U. preprint USITP-95-10 -
  2. [15][15] R. De Pietri and C. Rovelli: Geometry eigenvalues and scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity, Parma U. preprint UPRF 96-444 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loll, R.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Firenze (IT)
Corresponding author
Loll, R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1996-10-15
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
5381-5384
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2158823455
Cited by
19
References
6
Citations by year
2017: 2
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop quantum gravity, Hamiltonian constraint, SU(2) connection, lattice discretization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review