Cited by 47Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Non-perturbative solutions for lattice quantum gravity

Open access
Loll, R.·1995·Nuclear Physics B

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00184-t

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existence of this quantization ambiguity is due to the peculiar kind of representation on which nonperturbative quantum gravity is based.

    “The existence of this quantization ambiguity is due to the peculiar kind of representation on which nonperturbative quantum gravity is based [5,6].”

    From Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity (1998) · cites this paper as [5]

  • This representation is characterized by the fact that the holonomy is a well-defined operator in the quantum theory.

    “This representation is characterized by the fact that the holonomy is a well-defined operator in the quantum theory.”

    From Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity (1998) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7][7] Br¨ ugmann, B.: Loop representations, in Canonical gravity: from classical to quantum , ed. J. Ehlers and H. Friedrich, Lecture Notes in Physics 434, Springer, Berlin, 1994 -
  2. [13][13] Ashtekar, A., Lewandowski, L., Marolf, D., Mour˜ ao, J. and Thiemann, T.: Coherent state transform for spaces of connections, preprint Penn State U., Dec 1994, e-Print Archive: gr-qc 9412014 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loll, R.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Firenze (IT)
Corresponding author
Loll, R.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
444
Issue
3
Pages
619-639
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091923127
Cited by
47
References
28
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
lattice gravity, canonical quantum gravity, Wilson loops, Polyakov loop, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, non-perturbative solutions, gauge invariance, diffeomorphism invariance, kinematical Hilbert space, four-dimensional spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review