The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electroweak precision measurements and collider probes of the standard model with large extra dimensions
Open accessAbstract
The elementary particles of the standard model may reside in more than $3+1$ dimensions. We study the consequences of large compactified dimensions on scattering and decay observables at high-energy colliders. Our analysis includes global fits to electroweak precision data, indirect tests at high-energy electron-positron colliders (CERN LEP2 and NLC), and direct probes of the Kaluza-Klein resonances at hadron colliders (Fermilab Tevatron and CERN LHC). The present limits depend sensitively on the Higgs sector, both the mass of the Higgs boson and how many dimensions it feels. If the Higgs boson is trapped on a $(3+1)$-dimensional wall with the fermions, large Higgs boson masses (up to 500 GeV) and relatively light Kaluza-Klein mass scales (less than 4 Tev) can provide a good fit to precision data. That is, a light Higgs boson is not necessary to fit the electroweak precision data, as it is in the standard model. If the Higgs boson propagates in higher dimensions, precision data prefer a light Higgs boson (less than 260 GeV) and a higher compactification scale (greater than 3.8 TeV). Future colliders can probe much larger scales. For example, a 1.5 TeV electron-positron linear collider can indirectly discover Kaluza-Klein excitations up to 31 TeV if $500 {\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ integrated luminosity is obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions
Hořava, P., & Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00621-4 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
Bounds on universal extra dimensions
Appelquist, T., Cheng, H.-C., & Dobrescu, B. A. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.035002 · Cited by 1,200
Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking
Hill, C. T., & Simmons, E. H. (2003) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00140-6 · Cited by 892
Flavor physics of leptons and dipole moments
Raidal, M., van der Schaaf, A., Bigi, I., Mangano, M. L., Semertzidis, Y., Abel, S., Albino, S., Antusch, S., Arganda, E., Bajc, B., et al. (2008) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0715-2 · Cited by 368
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizzo, T. G., & Wells, J. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-12-13
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2006911792
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.