Cited by 133Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

On likely values of the cosmological constant

Open access
Garriga, Jaume, Vilenkin, Alexander·2000·Physical Review D

Abstract

We discuss models in which the smallness of the effective vacuum energy density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ and the coincidence of the time of its dominance ${t}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ with the epoch of galaxy formation ${t}_{G}$ are due to anthropic selection effects. In such models, the probability distribution for ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ is a product of an a priori distribution ${\mathcal{P}}_{*}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}})$ and of the number density of galaxies at a given ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ (which is proportional to the number of observers who will detect that value of ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}).$ To determine ${\mathcal{P}}_{*},$ we consider inflationary models in which the role of the vacuum energy is played by a slowly varying potential of some scalar field. We show that the resulting distribution depends on the shape of the potential and generally has a non-trivial dependence on ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}},$ even in the narrow anthropically allowed range. This is contrary to Weinberg's earlier conjecture that the a priori distribution should be nearly flat in the range of interest. We calculate the (final) probability distributions for ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ and for ${t}_{G}{/t}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ in simple models with power-law potentials. For some of these models, the agreement with the observationally suggested values of ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ is better than with a flat a priori distribution. We also discuss a quantum-cosmological approach in which ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}$ takes different values in different disconnected universes and argue that Weinberg's conjecture is not valid in this case as well. Finally, we extend our analysis to models of quintessence, with similar conclusions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.61.083502

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weinberg and Garriga & Vilenkin derive a probability distribution for the cosmological constant in an ensemble of regions generated in the same inflationary sequence via a given inflaton potential, where the cosmological constant is the potential energy of a scalar field.

    “Weinberg (2000a,b) and Garriga & Vilenkin (2000) derive a probability distribution for the cosmological constant in the context of an ensemble of regions generated in the same inflationary sequence via the action of a given inflaton potential, where the cosmological constant is given by the potential energy of a scalar field.”

    From Multiverses and physical cosmology (2004) · cites this paper as Garriga & Vilenkin 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. ͓1͔ V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky, ''The Case for a Positive Cos- mological Lambda-term,'' astro-ph/9904398. · arXiv
  2. ͓3͔ S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2607 ͑1987͒. ͓4͔ For an early attempt to apply anthropic arguments to the cos- mological constant, see also P. C. W. Davis and S. Unwin, Proc. R. Soc. London A377, 147 ͑1981͒.
  3. ͓7͔ W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 ͑1974͒.
  4. ͓9͔ S. Weinberg, in Critical Dialogues in Cosmology, edited by N. G. Turok ͑World Scientific, Singapore, 1997͒. ͓10͔ A similar argument for the coincidence of the present time t 0 with the curvature domination time t ⍀ in an open universe was given in ͓11͔.
  5. ͓13͔ S. Bludman, ''Vacuum Energy: If Not Now, Then When?'', astro-ph/9907168. · arXiv
  6. H. The -dependent ͓15͔ V. Vanchurin, A. Vilenkin, and S. Winitzki, gr-qc/9905097. · arXiv
  7. ͓16͔ H. Martel and P. R. Shapiro, astro-ph/9903425. ͓17͔ For a discussion and references see A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 58, 067301 ͑1998͒. · arXiv
  8. ͓26͔ A. A. Starobinsky, in Current Topics in Field Theory, Quan- tum Gravity and Strings, edited by H. J. de Vega and N. Sanchez, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 246 ͑Springer, Heidel- berg, 1986͒, pp. 107-126.
  9. L. Wang, R. R. Caldwell, J. P. Ostriker, and P. J. Steinhardt, astro-ph/9901388. · arXiv
  10. L. Amendola, astro-ph/9908023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garriga, J., & Vilenkin, A.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2000-03-13
Volume
61
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2013948905
Cited by
133
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
cosmological constant, anthropic principle, vacuum energy density, galaxy formation epoch, probability distributions, inflationary models, scalar field potential, power-law potential, quantum cosmology, multiverse, quintessence, coincidence problem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review