Cited by 9Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Quantum creation and inflationary universes: A critical appraisal

Open access
Coule, D. H.·2000·Physical Review D

Abstract

We contrast the possibility of inflation starting (a) from the universe's inception or (b) from an earlier noninflationary state. Neither case is ideal since (a) assumes that quantum mechanical reasoning is straightforwardly applicable to the early universe, while case (b) requires that a singularity still be present. Further, in agreement with Vachaspati and Trodden case (b) can only solve the horizon problem if the noninflationary phase has an equation of state $\ensuremath{\gamma}<4/3,$ thereby excluding radiation or massless scalar field dominated cases. Other alternative models, such as the smooth branch change in the pre-big-bang model, have related problems of requiring homogeneity over noncausally connected large scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.62.124010

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a classical analysis, any upper bound in the potential can lead to ambiguous predictions from inflation: the flatness would still be arbitrary using a classical canonical measure because the kinetic energy can diverge.

    “This is helpful since in a classical analysis it is known that any upper bound in the potential can lead to ambiguous predictions from inflation: the flatness would still be arbitrary [17-18] using a classical canonical measure [19]: essentially because the kinetic energy ˙ φ 2 can diverge.”

    From Entropic Issues in Contemporary Cosmology (2003) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coule, D. H.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Coule, D. H.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2000-11-20
Volume
62
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2008056250
Cited by
9
References
8
Citations by year
2013: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
quantum creation of the universe, cosmic inflation, horizon problem, singularities, equation of state, early universe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review