The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is cosmology consistent?
Open accessAbstract
We perform a detailed analysis of the latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements (including BOOMERaNG, DASI, Maxima and CBI), both alone and jointly with other cosmological data sets involving, e.g., galaxy clustering and the Lyman Alpha Forest. We first address the question of whether the CMB data are internally consistent once calibration and beam uncertainties are taken into account, performing a series of statistical tests. With a few minor caveats, our answer is yes, and we compress all data into a single set of 24 bandpowers with associated covariance matrix and window functions. We then compute joint constraints on the 11 parameters of the ``standard'' adiabatic inflationary cosmological model. Our best fit model passes a series of physical consistency checks and agrees with essentially all currently available cosmological data. In addition to sharp constraints on the cosmic matter budget in good agreement with those of the BOOMERaNG, DASI and Maxima teams, we obtain a heaviest neutrino mass range $0.04\ensuremath{-}4.2 \mathrm{eV}$ and the sharpest constraints to date on gravity waves which (together with preference for a slight red-tilt) favor ``small-field'' inflation models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe
Peebles, P. J. E., & Yu, J. T. (1970) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/150713 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
What Shapes the Luminosity Function of Galaxies?
Benson, A. J., Bower, R. G., Frenk, C. S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Cole, S. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/379160 · Cited by 893
Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP
de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Hamilton, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.063516 · Cited by 651
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Tegmark, M., & Zaldarriaga, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-05-24
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2048419561
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is cosmology consistent? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.65.123001
- The paper
- Wang, X., Tegmark, M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2002). Is cosmology consistent? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.65.123001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.