Cited by 1,230Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe

Peebles, P. J. E., Yu, J. T.·1970·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The general qualitative behavior of linear, first-order density perturbations in a Friedmann-Lemaitre cosmological model with radiation and matter has been known for some time in the various limiting situations. An exact quantitative calculation which traces tbe entire history of the density fluctuations is lacking because the usual approximations of a very short photon mean free path before plasma recombination, and a very long mean free path after, are inadequate. We present here results of the direct integration of the collision equation of the photon distribution function, which enable us to treat in detail the complicated regime of plasma recombination. Starting from an assumed initial power spectrum well before recombination, we obtain a final spectrum of density perturbations after recombination. The calculations are carried out for several general-relativity models and one scalar-tensor model. One can identify two characteristic masses in the final power spectrum: one is the mass within the Hubble radius ct at recombination, and the other results from the linear dissipation of the perturbations prior to recombination. Conceivably the first of these numbers is associated with the great rich clusters of galaxies, the second with the large galaxies. We compute also the expected residual irregularity in the radiation from the primeval fireball. If we assume that (1) the rich clusters formed from an initially adiabatic perturbation and (2) the fireball radiation has not been seriously perturbed after the epoch of recombination of the primeval plasma, then with an angular resolution of t minute of arc the rms fluctuation in antenna temperature should be at least T7T = 0.00015.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/150713

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primordial fluctuations would be scale invariant and described by a power spectrum.

    “These primordial fluctuations would be scale invariant and described by the power spectrum (Harrison 1970; Peebles and Yu 1970; Zeldovich 1972)48with .”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Peebles and Yu 1970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peebles, P. J. E., & Yu, J. T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1970-12
Volume
162
Pages
815
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2122083363
Cited by
1,230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 49
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
adiabatic perturbations, density perturbations, plasma recombination, photon mean free path, photon distribution function, power spectrum, FRW cosmology, scalar-tensor cosmology, Hubble radius, linear dissipation, galaxy clusters, cosmic microwave background anisotropies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review