Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

de Sitter vacua in string theory

Open access
Kachru, Shamit, Kallosh, Renata, Linde, Andrei, Trivedi, Sandip P.·2003·Physical Review D

Abstract

We outline the construction of metastable de Sitter vacua of type IIB string theory. Our starting point is highly warped IIB compactifications with nontrivial NS and RR three-form fluxes. By incorporating known corrections to the superpotential from Euclidean D-brane instantons or gaugino condensation, one can make models with all moduli fixed, yielding a supersymmetric AdS vacuum. Inclusion of a small number of $\overline{\mathrm{D}3}$-branes in the resulting warped geometry allows one to uplift the AdS minimum and make it a metastable de Sitter ground state. The lifetime of our metastable de Sitter vacua is much greater than the cosmological time scale of ${10}^{10}\mathrm{yr}.$ We also prove, under certain conditions, that the lifetime of dS space in string theory will always be shorter than the recurrence time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.68.046005

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. S. Hellerman, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 06, 003, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. W. Fischler, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 003, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/003 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Strominger, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 10, 034, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034 · DOI · Paper page
  4. J. Maldacena, 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 16, 822, 10.1142/S0217751X01003937 · DOI · Paper page
  5. B. de Wit, 1987, Nucl. Phys., B283, 165, 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90267-7 · DOI
  6. S.B. Giddings, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 106006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.106006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Kachru, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 06, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/021 · DOI · Paper page
  8. K. Dasgupta, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 126002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. Alexander, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 23507, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.023507 · DOI · Paper page
  10. C.P. Burgess, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 07, 047, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/047 · DOI · Paper page
  11. R. Kallosh, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 123503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.123503 · DOI
  12. P. Fre, 2002, Class. Quantum Grav., 19, 4167, 10.1088/0264-9381/19/15/319 · DOI
  13. M. de Roo, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 02, 003
  14. Y. Aghababaie, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 03, 032, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/03/032 · DOI
  15. R. Bousso, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 06, 006, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/006 · DOI · Paper page
  16. J. Feng, 2001, Nucl. Phys., B602, 307, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00097-9 · DOI
  17. K. Dasgupta, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 08, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/08/023 · DOI
  18. A. Frey, 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 126009, 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126009 · DOI
  19. R. D’Auria, 2002, New J. Phys., 4, 71, 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/371 · DOI
  20. A. Frey, 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 67, 046006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.046006 · DOI
  21. C. Vafa, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B469, 403, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00172-1 · DOI
  22. A. Sen, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7345, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.R7345 · DOI
  23. A. Klemm, 1998, Nucl. Phys., B518, 515, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00798-0 · DOI
  24. S. Gukov, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B584, 69, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00373-4 · DOI · Paper page
  25. T. Taylor, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 474, 130, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00005-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. G. Curio, 2001, Nucl. Phys., B609, 3, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00285-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. E. Cremmer, 1983, Phys. Lett., 133B, 61, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90106-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. J. Ellis, 1984, Phys. Lett., 429, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91378-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. K. Becker, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B477, 155, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00367-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. H. Verlinde, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B580, 264, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00224-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. C. Chan, 2000, Nucl. Phys., 156, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00267-4 · DOI
  32. P. Mayr, 2001, Nucl. Phys., B593, 99, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00552-6 · DOI
  33. P. Mayr, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 11, 013, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/013 · DOI
  34. B. Greene, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B584, 480, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00400-4 · DOI
  35. I.R. Klebanov, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 08, 052, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/08/052 · DOI · Paper page
  36. E. Witten, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B474, 343, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00283-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. P. Tripathy, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 03, 028, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/03/028 · DOI
  38. P. Candelas, 1997, Phys. Lett. B, 413, 63, 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01047-2 · DOI
  39. V. Kaplunovsky, 1998, Phys. Lett. B, 45, 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01373-7 · DOI
  40. K. Becker, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 06, 060, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/060 · DOI
  41. N.V. Krasnikov, 1987, Phys. Lett. B, 193, 37, 10.1016/0370-2693(87)90452-7 · DOI
  42. J. Maldacena, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 09, 024, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/024 · DOI
  43. G.W. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2738, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738 · DOI · Paper page
  44. G.W. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
  45. A.S. Goncharov, 1986, Sov. J. Part. Nucl., 17, 369
  46. A.D. Linde, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 083514, 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083514 · DOI · Paper page
  47. R. Bousso, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 084004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084004 · DOI
  48. R. Bousso, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 083503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083503 · DOI
  49. U. Gen, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 103508, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.103508 · DOI
  50. A.D. Linde, 1992, Nucl. Phys., B372, 421, 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90326-7 · DOI
  51. K. Becker, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 04, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/007 · DOI

Cited by

See all 3,321

Metadata

Authors
Kachru, S., Kallosh, R., Linde, A., & Trivedi, S. P.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2003-08-07
Volume
68
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2125835296
Cited by
3,321
References
9
FWCI
132.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.