CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,846Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

k-Inflation

Open access
Armendáriz-Picón, C., Damour, T., Mukhanov, V.·1999·Physics Letters B
DOI 10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Afshordi et al. (2007a, b) introduced Cuscuton based on infinite sound speed limit of k-essence model fluid.

    “Afshordi et al. (2007a, b) introduced a scalar–tensor model they call Cuscuton that is based on the infinite sound speed limit of k-essence model fluid (Armendáriz-Picón et al. 1999).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Armendáriz-Picón et al. 1999

  • k-essence is a model where late-time acceleration is caused by kinetic energy of scalar field and not potential energy; k-essence field has perturbations causing change in GR Poisson equation (Q≠1) but no gravitational slip.

    “k-essence is a model where the late-time acceleration is caused by the kinetic energy of the scalar field and not its potential energy as is the case in quintessence dark energy models (this the special case of Eq. (147) where only the second is present and the function K depends only on X there). k-essence field has perturbations which cause a change in the GR Poisson Eq. (86) (i.e., ) but no”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Armendáriz-Picón et al. 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armendáriz-Picón, C., Damour, T., & Mukhanov, V.
Affiliations
  • Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (FR)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
458
Issue
2-3
Pages
209-218
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6
OpenAlex
W3037516327
Cited by
1,846
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 103 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 94
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS8-39225)
  • Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, Université Paris-Saclay
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
k-inflation, slow-roll inflation, radiation domination, initial conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review