Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models

Open access
Olivares, Germań, Atrio-Barandela, Fernando, Pavón, Diego·2005·Physical Review D

Abstract

We determine the range of parameter space of an Interacting Quintessence Model that best fits the recent WMAP measurements of Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies. We only consider cosmological models with zero spatial curvature. We show that if the quintessence scalar field decays into cold dark matter at a rate that brings the ratio of matter to dark energy constant at late times, the cosmological parameters required to fit the CMB data are: dark energy density ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{x}=0.43\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.12$, baryon fraction ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{b}=0.08\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01$, slope of the matter power spectrum at large scales ${n}_{s}=0.98\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02$ and Hubble constant ${H}_{0}=56\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{Mpc}$. The data prefers a dark energy component with a dimensionless decay rate parameter ${c}^{2}=0.005$ and noninteracting models are consistent with the data only at the $99.9%$ confidence level. Using the Bayesian Information Criteria we show that this extra parameter fits the data better than models with no interaction. The quintessence equation of state parameter is less constrained; i.e., the data sets an upper limit ${w}_{x}\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{-}0.86$ at the same level of significance. When the WMAP anisotropy data are combined with supernovae data, the density parameter of dark energy increases to ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{x}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.68$ while ${c}^{2}$ augments to $6.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$. Models with quintessence decaying into dark matter provide a clean explanation for the coincidence problem and are a viable cosmological model, compatible with observations of the CMB, with testable predictions. Accurate measurements of baryon fraction and/or of matter density independent of the CMB data, would support/disprove these models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.71.063523

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Olivares, G., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2005-03-22
Volume
71
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2039439567
Cited by
211
References
5
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.71.063523
The paper
Olivares, G., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D. (2005). Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.71.063523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.