The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved constraints on non-Newtonian forces at 10 microns
Open accessAbstract
Several recent theories suggest that light moduli or particles in ``large'' extra dimensions could mediate macroscopic forces exceeding gravitational strength at length scales below a millimeter. Such new forces can be parameterized as a Yukawa-type correction to the Newtonian potential of strength $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ relative to gravity and range $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. To extend the search for such new physics we have improved our apparatus utilizing cryogenic micro-cantilevers capable of measuring attonewton forces, which now includes a switchable magnetic force for calibration. Our most recent experimental constraints on Yukawa-type deviations from Newtonian gravity are more than 3 times as stringent as our previously published results and represent the best bound in the range of $5--15\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$, with a 95% confidence exclusion of forces with $|\ensuremath{\alpha}|>14,000$ at $\ensuremath{\lambda}=10\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Submillimeter tests of the gravitational inverse-square law
Hoyle, C. D., Kapner, D. J., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Schmidt, U., & Swanson, H. E. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.042004 · Cited by 459
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00390-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00808-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00860-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.151101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.122001 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.101987 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s100530050041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.1646767 · doi:10.1063/1.1646767
- 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90498-9 · doi:10.1016/0304-3991(92)90498-9
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.160403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature01432 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.3084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.124021 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.021101 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles
Irastorza, I. G., & Redondo, J. (2018) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003 · Cited by 745
The landscape of QCD axion models
Di Luzio, L., Giannotti, M., Nardi, E., & Visinelli, L. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 · Cited by 657
Metadata
- Authors
- Geraci, A. A., Smullin, S. J., Weld, D. M., Chiaverini, J., & Kapitulnik, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-07-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1987468789
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.