The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor
Open accessAbstract
We propose two distinct atom interferometer gravitational wave detectors, one terrestrial and another satellite based, utilizing the core technology of the Stanford 10 m atom interferometer presently under construction. Each configuration compares two widely separated atom interferometers run using common lasers. The signal scales with the distance between the interferometers, which can be large since only the light travels over this distance, not the atoms. The terrestrial experiment with two $\ensuremath{\sim}10\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{m}$ atom interferometers separated by a $\ensuremath{\sim}1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}$ baseline can operate with strain sensitivity $\ensuremath{\sim}\frac{{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19}}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}}$ in the 1 Hz--10 Hz band, inaccessible to LIGO, and can detect gravitational waves from solar mass binaries out to megaparsec distances. The satellite experiment with two atom interferometers separated by a $\ensuremath{\sim}1000\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}$ baseline can probe the same frequency spectrum as LISA with comparable strain sensitivity $\ensuremath{\sim}\frac{{10}^{\ensuremath{-}20}}{\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}}$. The use of ballistic atoms (instead of mirrors) as inertial test masses improves systematics coming from vibrations and acceleration noise, and significantly reduces spacecraft control requirements. We analyze the backgrounds in this configuration and discuss methods for controlling them to the required levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arvanitaki, A., Dimopoulos, S., Dubovsky, S., Kaloper, N., & March-Russell, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123530 · Cited by 1,941
Self-citationDiscovering the QCD axion with black holes and gravitational waves
Arvanitaki, A., Baryakhtar, M., & Huang, X. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.084011 · Cited by 543
Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks
Arvanitaki, A., Huang, J., & Van Tilburg, K. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.015015 · Cited by 404
Stability enhancement by joint phase measurements in a single cold atomic fountain
Meunier, M., Dutta, I., Geiger, R., Guerlin, C., Garrido Alzar, C. L., & Landragin, A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063633 · Cited by 40
MICROSCOPE’s view at gravitation
Bergé, J. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd203 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimopoulos, S., Graham, P. W., Hogan, J. M., Kasevich, M. A., & Rajendran, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-12-19
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1894115822
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.78.122002
- The paper
- Dimopoulos, S., Graham, P. W., Hogan, J. M., Kasevich, M. A., & Rajendran, S. (2008). Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.122002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.