Cited by 76Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity and the large scale structure of the Universe

Open access
Bañados, M., Ferreira, P. G., Skordis, C.·2009·Physical Review D

Abstract

It has been argued that a Universe governed by Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity can be compatible with current cosmological constraints. The extra fields introduced in this theory can behave as both dark matter and dark energy, unifying the dark sector in one coherent framework. We show the various roles the extra fields can play in the expansion of the Universe and study the evolution of linear perturbations in the various regimes. We find that, as a unified theory of the dark sector, Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity will lead to excessive fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background on large scales. In the presence of a cosmological constant, however, the extra fields can behave as a form of nonparticulate dark matter and can lead to a cosmology which is entirely compatible with current observations of large scale structure. We discuss the interpretation of this form of dark matter and how it can differ from standard, particulate dark matter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.79.063511

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EBI theory combines the metric tensor plus a connection, and the connection can be replaced by a corresponding metric, expressing the theory as bimetric gravity with cosmological features that can account for dark matter and dark energy.

    “It was shown in Bañados et al. (2009b) that the connection can be replaced by a corresponding metric and thus expressing the theory as a bimetric gravity with interesting cosmological features that can account for dark matter and dark energy and thus a possible unifying theory (Bañados et al. 2009a, b; Hu 1998).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Bañados et al. 2009a, b

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bañados, M., Ferreira, P. G., & Skordis, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Perimeter Institute (CA)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2009-03-13
Volume
79
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1992989358
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/F003110/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
large-scale structure, dark matter, dark energy, unified dark sector, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, linear perturbations, cosmological constant, modified gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review