Cited by 159Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Restricted Proof that the Weak Equivalence Principle Implies the Einstein Equivalence Principle

Open access
Lightman, Alan P., Lee, David L.·1973·Physical Review D

Abstract

Schiff has conjectured that the weak equivalence principle (WEP: free-fall trajectories independent of test-body composition) implies the Einstein equivalence principle (EEP: all nongravitational laws of physics the same in every freely falling frame). This paper presents a proof of Schiff's conjecture, restricted to (i) test bodies, made of electromagnetically interacting point particles, that fall from rest in a static, spherically symmetric gravitational field; and (ii) theories of gravity within a certain broad class---a class that includes almost all complete relativistic theories that we have found in the literature, but with each theory truncated to contain only point particles plus electromagnetic and gravitational fields. The proof shows that every "nonmetric" theory in the class (every theory that violates EEP) must violate WEP. A formula is derived for the magnitude of the violation. Comparison with the results of E\"otv\"os-Dicke-type experiments rules out various nonmetric theories, including those of Belinfante and Swihart and of Naida and Capella---theories that previously were believed to agree with all current experiments. It is shown that WEP is a powerful theoretical and experimental tool for constraining the manner in which gravity couples to electromagnetism in gravitation theories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.8.364

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The c2 framework is the flat space limit of the THεμ framework.

    “The c2 framework [277] is the flat space limit of the THϵμ [205] framework.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [205]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. K. Nordtvedt, Jr., Int. Journ. of Theo. Phys. 3, 133 (1970).
  2. F. J. Belinfante and J. C. Swihart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 2, 196 (1957).
  3. E. J. Post, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 70, 507 (1972).
  4. F. J. Belinfante and J. C Swihart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 1, 168 (1957).
  5. A. Capella, Nuovo Cimento 42, 1961 (1966).
  6. N. Naida, Sov. Phys.-JETP 14, 475 (1969).
  7. We refer to the "early" version of Whitehead's theory as given by J. L. Synge, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 211A, 303 (1952).
  8. D. R. Brill in Evidence for Gravitation Theories, ed. C. M4ller (Academic Press, 1962).
  9. A. M. Volkov, A. A. Izmest'cv, G. V. Krotskii, Sov. Phys.-JETP 32, 686 (1971)
  10. R. H. Dicke in Evidence for Gravitation Theories, ed. C. M4ller (Academic Press, 1962).
  11. V. B. Braginsky and V. I. Panov, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 61, 875 (1971).
  12. C. M. Will, Lectures in Proceedings of Course 56 of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi," ed.,B. Bertotti (Academic Press, New York) in press, also distributed as a Caltech Preprint OAP-289 (1972).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lightman, A. P., & Lee, D. L.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1973-07-15
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
364-376
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990918874
Cited by
159
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NGR 05-002-256)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
weak equivalence principle, Einstein equivalence principle, point particles, electromagnetic interaction, modified gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review