Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Axion cosmology revisited

Open access
Wantz, Olivier, Shellard, E. P. S.·2010·Physical Review D

Abstract

The misalignment mechanism for axion production depends on the temperature-dependent axion mass. The latter has recently been determined within the interacting instanton liquid model, and provides for the first time a well-motivated axion mass for all temperatures. We reexamine the constraints placed on the axion parameter space in the light of this new mass function. Taking this mass at face value, we find an accurate and updated constraint ${f}_{a}\ensuremath{\le}2.8(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{11}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ or ${m}_{a}\ensuremath{\ge}21(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2)\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{eV}$ from the misalignment mechanism in the classic axion window (thermal scenario). However, this is superseded by axion string radiation which leads to ${f}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{3.2}_{\ensuremath{-}2}^{+4}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{10}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ or ${m}_{a}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{0.20}_{\ensuremath{-}0.1}^{+0.2}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{meV}$. In this analysis, we take care to precisely compute the effective degrees of freedom and, to fill a gap in the literature, we present accurate fitting formulas. We solve the evolution equations exactly, and find that analytic results used to date generally underestimate the full numerical solution by a factor 2--3. In the inflationary scenario, axions induce isocurvature fluctuations and constrain the allowed inflationary scale ${H}_{I}$. Taking anharmonic effects into account, we show that these bounds are actually weaker than previously computed. Considering the fine-tuning issue of the misalignment angle in the whole of the anthropic window, we derive new bounds which open up the inflationary window near ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{a}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}$. In particular, we find that inflationary dark matter axions can have masses as high as $0.01--1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{meV}$, covering the whole thermal axion range, with values of ${H}_{I}$ up to ${10}^{9}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. Quantum fluctuations during inflation exclude dominant dark matter axions with masses above ${m}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{meV}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.82.123508

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Wantz, O., & Shellard, E. P. S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2010-12-02
Volume
82
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2050999767
Cited by
310
References
63
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Axion cosmology revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.82.123508
The paper
Wantz, O., & Shellard, E. P. S. (2010). Axion cosmology revisited. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.123508

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.