The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal
Open accessAbstract
We present a simple method to track the precession of a black-hole-binary system during the inspiral, using only information from the gravitational-wave (GW) signal. Our method consists of locating the frame from which the magnitudes of the ($\ensuremath{\ell}=2$, $|m|=2$) modes are maximized, which we denote the ``quadrupole-aligned'' frame. We demonstrate the efficacy of this method when applied to waveforms from numerical simulations. In the test case of an equal-mass nonspinning binary, our method locates the direction of the orbital angular momentum to within $(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\theta},\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\varphi})=(0.05\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},0.2\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{})$. We then apply the method to a $q={M}_{2}/{M}_{1}=3$ binary that exhibits significant precession. In general, a spinning binary's orbital angular momentum $\mathbf{L}$ is not orthogonal to the orbital plane. Evidence that our method locates the direction of $\mathbf{L}$ rather than the normal of the orbital plane is provided by comparison with post-Newtonian results. Also, we observe that it accurately reproduces similar higher-mode amplitudes to a comparable non-precessing binary, and that the frequency of the ($\ensuremath{\ell}=2$, $|m|=2$) modes is consistent with the ``total frequency'' of the binary's motion. The simple form of the quadrupole-aligned waveform may be useful in attempts to analytically model the inspiral-merger-ringdown signal of precessing binaries, and in standardizing the representation of waveforms for studies of accuracy and consistency of source modelling efforts, both numerical and analytical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Cited by
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
Self-citationAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Self-citationGW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 · Cited by 657
Self-citationPratten, G., García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Ramos-Buades, A., Estellés, H., Mateu-Lucena, M., Jaume, R., Haney, M., Keitel, D., Thompson, J. E., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104056 · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, P., Hannam, M., Husa, S., & Ajith, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-07-29
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2112230183
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.