The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-independent test of general relativity: An extended post-Einsteinian framework with complete polarization content
Open accessAbstract
We develop a model-independent test of general relativity that allows for the constraint of the gravitational wave (GW) polarization content with GW detections of binary compact object inspirals. We first consider three modified gravity theories (Brans-Dicke theory, Rosen's theory, and Lightman-Lee theory) and calculate the response function of ground-based detectors to gravitational waves in the inspiral phase. This allows us to see how additional polarizations predicted in these theories modify the general relativistic prediction of the response function. We then consider general power-law modifications to the Hamiltonian and radiation-reaction force and study how these modify the time-domain and Fourier response function when all polarizations are present. From these general arguments and specific modified gravity examples, we infer an improved parameterized post-Einsteinian template family with complete polarization content. This family enhances general relativity templates through the inclusion of new theory parameters, reducing to the former when these parameters acquire certain values, and recovering modified gravity predictions for other values, including all polarizations. We conclude by discussing detection strategies to constrain these new, polarization theory parameters by constructing certain null channels through the combination of output from multiple detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm
Bekenstein, J. D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083509 · Cited by 1,487
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Will, C. M., & Eardley, D. M. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/182382 · Cited by 68
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationCan environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?
Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.104059 · Cited by 605
Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology
Bahamonde, S., Dialektopoulos, K. F., Escamilla-Rivera, C., Farrugia, G., Gakis, V., Hendry, M., Hohmann, M., Levi Said, J., Mifsud, J., & Di Valentino, E. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac9cef · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatziioannou, K., Yunes, N., & Cornish, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-07-23
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2091980335
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-independent test of general relativity: An extended post-Einsteinian framework with complete polarization content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.86.022004
- The paper
- Chatziioannou, K., Yunes, N., & Cornish, N. (2012). Model-independent test of general relativity: An extended post-Einsteinian framework with complete polarization content. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.022004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.