The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?
Open accessAbstract
No, within a broad class of scenarios. Gravitational-wave (GW) astronomy will open a new window on compact objects such as neutron stars and black holes (BHs). It is often stated that large signal-to-noise detections of ringdown or inspiral waveforms can provide estimates of the masses and spins of compact objects to within fractions of a percent, as well as tests of general relativity. These expectations usually neglect the realistic astrophysical environments in which compact objects live. With the advent of GW astronomy, environmental effects on the GW signal will eventually have to be quantified. Here we present a wide survey of the corrections due to these effects in two situations of great interest for GW astronomy: the BH ringdown emission and the inspiral of two compact objects (especially BH binaries). We mainly focus on future space-based detectors such as eLISA, but many of our results are also valid for ground-based detectors such as aLIGO, aVirgo, and KAGRA. We take into account various effects such as electric charges, magnetic fields, cosmological evolution, possible deviations from general relativity, firewalls, and the effects related to various forms of matter such as accretion disks and dark matter halos. Our analysis predicts the existence of resonances dictated by the external mass distribution, which dominate the very late-time behavior of merger and ringdown waveforms. The mode structure can drastically differ from the vacuum case, yet the BH response to external perturbations is unchanged at the time scales relevant for detectors. This is because, although the vacuum Schwarzschild resonances are no longer quasinormal modes of the system, they still dominate the response at intermediate times. Our results strongly suggest that both parametrized and ringdown searches should use at least two-mode templates. Our analysis of compact binaries shows that environmental effects are typically negligible for most eLISA sources, with the exception of very few special extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. We show, in particular, that accretion and hydrodynamic drag generically dominate over self-force effects for geometrically thin disks, whereas they can be safely neglected for geometrically thick disk environments, which are the most relevant for eLISA. Finally, we discuss how our ignorance of the matter surrounding compact objects implies intrinsic limits on the ability to constrain strong-field deviations from general relativity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The cosmological constant problem
Weinberg, S. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 · Cited by 7,341
A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft
Bertotti, B., Iess, L., & Tortora, P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01997 · Cited by 2,017
Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176343 · Cited by 1,679
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123 · Cited by 1,471
Protoplanet Migration by Nebula Tides
Ward, W. R. (1997) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1996.5647 · Cited by 1,071
Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame
Jacobson, T., & Mattingly, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.024028 · Cited by 944
Chern–Simons modified general relativity
Alexander, S., & Yunes, N. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.07.002 · Cited by 715
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., Stanford, D., & Sully, J. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)018 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Is the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon?
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., & Pani, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.171101 · Cited by 819
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Self-citationAstrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y · Cited by 609
Self-citationLight-Ring Stability for Ultracompact Objects
Cunha, P. V. P., Berti, E., & Herdeiro, C. A. R. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.251102 · Cited by 375
Hui, L. (2021) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010024 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-05-28
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2010218176
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.89.104059
- The paper
- Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2014). Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics? Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.89.104059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.