Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perturbations of slowly rotating black holes: Massive vector fields in the Kerr metric

Open access
Pani, Paolo, Cardoso, Vitor, Gualtieri, Leonardo, Berti, Emanuele, Ishibashi, Akihiro·2012·Physical Review D

Abstract

We discuss a general method to study linear perturbations of slowly rotating black holes which is valid for any perturbation field, and particularly advantageous when the field equations are not separable. As an illustration of the method we investigate massive vector (Proca) perturbations in the Kerr metric, which do not appear to be separable in the standard Teukolsky formalism. Working in a perturbative scheme, we discuss two important effects induced by rotation: a Zeeman-like shift of nonaxisymmetric quasinormal modes and bound states with different azimuthal number $m$, and the coupling between axial and polar modes with different multipolar index $\ensuremath{\ell}$. We explicitly compute the perturbation equations up to second order in rotation, but in principle the method can be extended to any order. Working at first order in rotation we show that polar and axial Proca modes can be computed by solving two decoupled sets of equations, and we derive a single master equation describing axial perturbations of spin $s=0$ and $s=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$. By extending the calculation to second order we can study the superradiant regime of Proca perturbations in a self-consistent way. For the first time we show that Proca fields around Kerr black holes exhibit a superradiant instability, which is significantly stronger than for massive scalar fields. Because of this instability, astrophysical observations of spinning black holes provide the tightest upper limit on the mass of the photon: ${m}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}20}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ under our most conservative assumptions. Spin measurements for the largest black holes could reduce this bound to ${m}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ or lower.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.86.104017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Pani, P., Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Berti, E., & Ishibashi, A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2012-11-06
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
104017
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1983163427
Cited by
242
References
4
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perturbations of slowly rotating black holes: Massive vector fields in the Kerr metric. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.86.104017
The paper
Pani, P., Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Berti, E., & Ishibashi, A. (2012). Perturbations of slowly rotating black holes: Massive vector fields in the Kerr metric. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.104017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.