Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center

Open access
Abazajian, Kevork N., Canac, Nicolas, Horiuchi, Shunsaku, Kaplinghat, Manoj·2014·Physical Review D

Abstract

We construct empirical models of the diffuse gamma-ray background toward the Galactic Center. Including all known point sources and a template of emission associated with interactions of cosmic rays with molecular gas, we show that the extended emission observed previously in the Fermi Large Area Telescope data toward the Galactic Center is detected at high significance for all permutations of the diffuse model components. However, we find that the fluxes and spectra of the sources in our model change significantly depending on the background model. In particular, the spectrum of the central Sgr A* source is less steep than in previous works and the recovered spectrum of the extended emission has large systematic uncertainties, especially at lower energies. If the extended emission is interpreted to be due to dark matter annihilation, we find annihilation into pure $b$-quark and $\ensuremath{\tau}$-lepton channels to be statistically equivalent goodness of fits. In the case of the pure $b$-quark channel, we find a dark matter mass of $39.4(\genfrac{}{}{0}{}{+3.7}{\ensuremath{-}2.9}\text{ }\text{stat})(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7.9\text{ }\mathrm{sys})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, while a pure ${\ensuremath{\tau}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\tau}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$-channel case has an estimated dark matter mass of $9.43(\genfrac{}{}{0}{}{+0.63}{\ensuremath{-}0.52}\text{stat})(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.2\text{ }\mathrm{sys})\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. Alternatively, if the extended emission is interpreted to be astrophysical in origin such as due to unresolved millisecond pulsars, we obtain strong bounds on dark matter annihilation, although systematic uncertainties due to the dependence on the background models are significant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.90.023526

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Abazajian, K. N., Canac, N., Horiuchi, S., & Kaplinghat, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2014-07-18
Volume
90
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2122469395
Cited by
390
References
2
FWCI
37.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.90.023526
The paper
Abazajian, K. N., Canac, N., Horiuchi, S., & Kaplinghat, M. (2014). Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.90.023526

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.