Cited by 331Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Two emission mechanisms in the Fermi Bubbles: A possible signal of annihilating dark matter

Open access
Hooper, Dan, Slatyer, Tracy R.·2013·Physics of the Dark Universe

Abstract

We study the variation of the spectrum of the Fermi Bubbles with Galactic latitude. Far from the Galactic plane (|b|≳ 30°), the observed gamma-ray emission is nearly invariant with latitude, and is consistent with arising from inverse Compton scattering of the interstellar radiation field by cosmic-ray electrons with an approximately power-law spectrum. The same electrons in the presence of microgauss-scale magnetic fields can also generate the the observed microwave “haze”. At lower latitudes (|b|≲ 20°), in contrast, the spectrum of the emission correlated with the Bubbles possesses a pronounced spectral feature peaking at ∼1–4 GeV (in E2dN/dE) which cannot be generated by any realistic spectrum of electrons. Instead, we conclude that a second (non-inverse-Compton) emission mechanism must be responsible for the bulk of the low-energy, low-latitude emission. This second component is spectrally similar to the excess GeV emission previously reported from the Galactic Center (GC), and also appears spatially consistent with a luminosity per volume falling approximately as r−2.4, where r is the distance from the GC. Consequently, we argue that the spectral feature visible in the low-latitude Bubbles is most likely the extended counterpart of the GC excess, now detected out to at least ∼2–3 kpc from the GC. The spectrum and angular distribution of the signal is broadly consistent with that predicted from ∼10 GeV dark matter particles annihilating to leptons, or from ∼50 GeV dark matter particles annihilating to quarks, following a distribution similar to, but slightly steeper than, the canonical Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) profile. We also consider millisecond pulsars as a possible astrophysical explanation for the signal, as observed millisecond pulsars possess a spectral cutoff at approximately the required energy. Any such scenario would require a large population of unresolved millisecond pulsars extending at least 2–3 kpc from the GC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dark.2013.06.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dark matter annihilation or pulsars can only explain the low-latitude γ-rays.

    “Such emission, however, can only explain the low-latitude γ -rays (depending on the assumed interaction cross section) and are clouded by the huge uncertainty in the nature of dark matter itself.”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Hooper & Slatyer 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooper, D., & Slatyer, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Corresponding author
Slatyer, Tracy R.
Venue
Physics of the Dark Universe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
118-138
ISSN
2212-6864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963660918
Cited by
331
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
29.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics of the Dark Universe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0907744, 1066293, 0807444)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Aspen Center for Physics (1066293, PHYS-1066293)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
Fermi bubbles, dark matter annihilation, gamma-ray emission, Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, inverse Compton scattering, cosmic ray electrons, galactic magnetic fields, pulsar emission, dark matter annihilation cross section, Navarro-Frenk-White profile, Galactic latitude dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review