The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Modified gravity with massive neutrinos as a testable alternative cosmological model
Open accessAbstract
We show that, in the presence of massive neutrinos, the Galileon gravity model provides a very good fit to the current cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, CMB lensing and baryonic acoustic oscillation data. This model, which we dub $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$, when assuming its stable attractor background solution, contains the same set of free parameters as lambda cold dark matter ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$), although it leads to different expansion dynamics and nontrivial gravitational interactions. The data provide compelling evidence ($\ensuremath{\gtrsim}6\ensuremath{\sigma}$) for nonzero neutrino masses, with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}{m}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ at the $2\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level. Upcoming precision terrestrial measurements of the absolute neutrino mass scale therefore have the potential to test this model. We show that CMB lensing measurements at multipoles $l\ensuremath{\lesssim}40$ will be able to discriminate between the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ models. Unlike $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$, the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ model is consistent with local determinations of the Hubble parameter. The presence of massive neutrinos lowers the value of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}$ substantially, despite of the enhanced gravitational strength on large scales. Unlike $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$, the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ model predicts a negative ISW effect, which is difficult to reconcile with current observational limits.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some modified gravity models reduce or alleviate the tension in the Hubble parameter.
“As we discuss further below in some of the sub-sections (see e.g., Sects. 9.7 and 9.9), some authors find that some modified gravity models reduce or alleviate the tension in the Hubble parameter (see e.g., Barreira et al. 2014a; Belgacem et al. 2018b).”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Barreira et al. 2014a
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.064015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0370-2693(72)90147-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.021802 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.251102 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024023 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/056 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/012 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/027 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123503 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)123 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.111301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.124016 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103511 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.121302 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103523 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/029 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21888.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22066.x · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119 · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/13 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00835.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201014468 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.051302 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.051303 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.221102 · DOI
- 10.1155/2013/293986 · DOI
- 10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106301 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21896.x · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/110 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16866.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16278.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16054.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200912763 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Barreira, A., Li, B., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-07-21
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1503657109
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Royal Astronomical Society
- European Commission (FP7 ITN, 289442)
- Durham University (ST/K00042X/1)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K00042X/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/F002300/1, ST/F001166/1, ST/H008519/1, PITN-GA-2011-289442, ST/I001166/1, ST/K003267/1)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/75791/2011)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- modified gravity, massive neutrinos, neutrino mass, cosmic microwave background, CMB lensing, baryon acoustic oscillations, LambdaCDM comparison, Hubble parameter, sigma_8, integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, dark energy, cosmological model discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review