Cited by 38Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNeutrino Physics ResearchDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Modified gravity with massive neutrinos as a testable alternative cosmological model

Open access

Abstract

We show that, in the presence of massive neutrinos, the Galileon gravity model provides a very good fit to the current cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, CMB lensing and baryonic acoustic oscillation data. This model, which we dub $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$, when assuming its stable attractor background solution, contains the same set of free parameters as lambda cold dark matter ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$), although it leads to different expansion dynamics and nontrivial gravitational interactions. The data provide compelling evidence ($\ensuremath{\gtrsim}6\ensuremath{\sigma}$) for nonzero neutrino masses, with $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}{m}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.4\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ at the $2\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level. Upcoming precision terrestrial measurements of the absolute neutrino mass scale therefore have the potential to test this model. We show that CMB lensing measurements at multipoles $l\ensuremath{\lesssim}40$ will be able to discriminate between the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ models. Unlike $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$, the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ model is consistent with local determinations of the Hubble parameter. The presence of massive neutrinos lowers the value of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}$ substantially, despite of the enhanced gravitational strength on large scales. Unlike $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$, the $\ensuremath{\nu}\text{Galileon}$ model predicts a negative ISW effect, which is difficult to reconcile with current observational limits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.90.023528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some modified gravity models reduce or alleviate the tension in the Hubble parameter.

    “As we discuss further below in some of the sub-sections (see e.g., Sects. 9.7 and 9.9), some authors find that some modified gravity models reduce or alleviate the tension in the Hubble parameter (see e.g., Barreira et al. 2014a; Belgacem et al. 2018b).”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Barreira et al. 2014a

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084003 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.064015 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0370-2693(72)90147-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.021802 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.251102 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024023 · DOI
  8. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/056 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/012 · DOI
  10. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/027 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123503 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)123 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.111301 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.124016 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103511 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.121302 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103523 · DOI
  19. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/029 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103511 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21888.x · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22066.x · DOI
  23. 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119 · DOI
  24. 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/13 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00835.x · DOI
  26. 10.1051/0004-6361/201014468 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.051302 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.051303 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.221102 · DOI
  30. 10.1155/2013/293986 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106301 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21896.x · DOI
  33. 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/110 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16866.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16278.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16054.x · DOI
  37. 10.1051/0004-6361/200912763 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Barreira, A., Li, B., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2014-07-21
Volume
90
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1503657109
Cited by
38
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Royal Astronomical Society
  • European Commission (FP7 ITN, 289442)
  • Durham University (ST/K00042X/1)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/K00042X/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/F002300/1, ST/F001166/1, ST/H008519/1, PITN-GA-2011-289442, ST/I001166/1, ST/K003267/1)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/75791/2011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
modified gravity, massive neutrinos, neutrino mass, cosmic microwave background, CMB lensing, baryon acoustic oscillations, LambdaCDM comparison, Hubble parameter, sigma_8, integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, dark energy, cosmological model discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review