Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tenth-order electron anomalous magnetic moment: Contribution of diagrams without closed lepton loops

Open access
Aoyama, Tatsumi, Hayakawa, Masashi, Kinoshita, Toichiro, Nio, Makiko·2015·Physical Review D

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed account of the evaluation of the electron anomalous magnetic moment ${a}_{e}$ which arises from a gauge-invariant set, called Set V, consisting of 6354 tenth-order Feynman diagrams without closed lepton loops. The latest value of the sum of Set V diagrams evaluated by the Monte Carlo integration routine VEGAS is 8.726 $(336)(\ensuremath{\alpha}/\ensuremath{\pi}{)}^{5}$, which replaces the very preliminary value reported in 2012. Combining it with 6318 previously published tenth-order diagrams, we obtain 7.795 $(336)(\ensuremath{\alpha}/\ensuremath{\pi}{)}^{5}$ as the complete mass-independent tenth-order term. Together with the improved value of the eighth-order term this leads to ${a}_{e}(\text{theory})=1\text{ }159\text{ }652\text{ }181.643\text{ }(25)(23)(16)(763)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$, where the first three uncertainties are from the eighth-order, tenth-order, and hadronic and elecroweak terms. The fourth and largest uncertainty is from ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=137.035\text{ }999\text{ }049\text{ }(90)$, the fine-structure constant derived from the rubidium recoil measurement. Thus, ${a}_{e}(\text{experiment})\ensuremath{-}{a}_{e}(\text{theory})=\ensuremath{-}0.91\text{ }(0.82)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$. Assuming the validity of the standard model, we obtain the fine-structure constant ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}({a}_{e})=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}137.035\text{ }999\text{ }1570\text{ }(29)(27)(18)(331)$, where uncertainties are from the eighth-order, tenth-order, and hadronic and electroweak terms, and the measurement of ${a}_{e}$. This is the most precise value of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ available at present and provides a stringent constraint on possible theories beyond the standard model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.91.033006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Aoyama, T., Hayakawa, M., Kinoshita, T., & Nio, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
91
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2004331016
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tenth-order electron anomalous magnetic moment: Contribution of diagrams without closed lepton loops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.91.033006
The paper
Aoyama, T., Hayakawa, M., Kinoshita, T., & Nio, M. (2015). Tenth-order electron anomalous magnetic moment: Contribution of diagrams without closed lepton loops. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.91.033006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.