Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers

Open access
Cardoso, Vitor, Franzin, Edgardo, Maselli, Andrea, Pani, Paolo, Raposo, Guilherme·2017·Physical Review D

Abstract

The authors calculate the tidal Love numbers (TLN), which encode the effect of rapidly changing gravitational fields on deformable, self-gravitating objects, for various exotic compact objects. They have found a universal logarithmic dependence of the TLNs close to black holes and use this to propose future gravitational wave measurements of TLNs, which would provide a test for general relativity in the strong field regime.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.95.084014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., Maselli, A., Pani, P., & Raposo, G.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
95
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2574203314
Cited by
306
References
4
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.95.084014
The paper
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., Maselli, A., Pani, P., & Raposo, G. (2017). Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.95.084014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.