Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lorentzian quantum cosmology

Feldbrugge, Job, Lehners, Jean-Luc, Turok, Neil·2017·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.95.103508

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zeldovich and Starobinsky state that for massless conformally coupled fields in a toroidal universe described by the metric (57) with the stated identifications, the Casimir contribution to the energy-momentum tensor has the form T^(C)μν = -(C/a^4) diag(1, -1/3, -1/3, -1/3).

    “Zeldovich and Starobinsky (ZS), citing Refs.[12,[35][36][37][38], state that for massless conformally coupled fields in a toroidal universe described by the metric (57) with the stated identifications, the Casimir contribution to the energymomentum tensor has the form”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction discusses a closed-universe model and Lorentzian path integrals, not Casimir energy in a toroidal universe. Searches for Zeldovich and Starobinsky, conformally coupled fields, and the stated energy-momentum tensor found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. S. W. Hawking, 1982, Pontif. Acad. Sci. Scr. Varia, 48, 563
  2. 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123537 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.509 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3560 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0375-9601(77)90244-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0550-3213(78)90161-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2206 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1815 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1170 · DOI
  11. 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/07/073 · DOI
  12. 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/04/005 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.021301 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF02790571 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1142/S0217751X9000163X · DOI
  16. S. Das, 1991, Modern quantum field theory. Proceedings, International Colloquium, 10.1142/1085 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1931 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2581 · DOI
  19. E. Arnold, 2012, Singularities of Differentiable Maps, Volume 2: Monodromy and Asymptotics of Integrals, 10.1007/978-0-8176-8343-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1090/amsip/050/19 · DOI
  21. M. Cristoforetti, Proc. Sci., 2014, 197
  22. 10.1016/0370-2693(77)90553-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3159 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.297 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2468 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.705 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083525 · DOI
  28. C. Grosche, 1998, Handbook of Feynman Path Integrals, 10.1007/BFb0109520 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.021301 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.01.028 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/023 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2572 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083542 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feldbrugge, J., Lehners, J.-L., & Turok, N.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2017-05-16
Volume
95
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 2470-0010
  • 2470-0029
Cited by
192
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Government of Canada
  • Province of Ontario

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review