The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation
Open accessAbstract
One-mode projecting is extensively used to compress bipartite networks. Since one-mode projection is always less informative than the bipartite representation, a proper weighting method is required to better retain the original information. In this article, inspired by the network-based resource-allocation dynamics, we raise a weighting method which can be directly applied in extracting the hidden information of networks, with remarkably better performance than the widely used global ranking method as well as collaborative filtering. This work not only provides a creditable method for compressing bipartite networks, but also highlights a possible way for the better solution of a long-standing challenge in modern information science: How to do a personal recommendation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Classes of small-world networks
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200327197 · Cited by 3,051
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1038/35065725 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00018730110112519 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/S003614450342480 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00018730601170527 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.056107 · DOI
- 10.1038/35082140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35036627 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Scott, 2000, Social Network Analysis, 10.1177/0038038588022001007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.021544898 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.046116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.physa.2005.05.044 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.248701 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.121 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.066107 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2137622 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0610487104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/MIC.2003.1167344 · DOI · Paper page
- K. Yammine, 2004, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3220, 720, 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_68 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.066117 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056127 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046105 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.036106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036120 · DOI
- M. Peltomäki, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp., 2006, P01010
- J. W. Grossman, 1995, Congr. Numer., 108, 129
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0129183107010437 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physa.2006.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.physa.2004.11.039 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0307545100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/316194.316229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00083-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/324133.324140 · DOI · Paper page
- B. Alexander, 2006, Educ. Res., 41, 33
- 10.1509/jmkr.37.3.363.18779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.355 · DOI
- 10.1006/jcss.2001.1757 · DOI
- 10.1145/345124.345143 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022850703159 · DOI · Paper page
- J. L. Herlocker, 2004, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. secur., 22, 5, 10.1145/963770.963772 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1209/epl/i2006-10204-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.021102 · DOI
- 10.1145/245108.245126 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1011419012209 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654
Modeling Relation Paths for Representation Learning of Knowledge Bases
Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Luan, H., Sun, M., Rao, S., & Liu, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1082 · Cited by 657
A review of network-based approaches to drug repositioning
Lotfi Shahreza, M., Ghadiri, N., Mousavi, S. R., Varshosaz, J., & Green, J. R. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx017 · Cited by 330
ProjE: Embedding Projection for Knowledge Graph Completion
Shi, B., & Weninger, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10677 · Cited by 218
Bougioukas, K. I., Vounzoulaki, E., Mantsiou, C. D., Savvides, E. D., Karakosta, C., Diakonidis, T., Tsapas, A., & Haidich, A.-B. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.004 · Cited by 117
Wardeh, M., Sharkey, K. J., & Baylis, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2882 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, T., Ren, J., Medo, M., & Zhang, Y.-C.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-10-25
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 046115-046115
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W1893639437
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.