The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communicability across evolving networks
Open accessAbstract
Many natural and technological applications generate time-ordered sequences of networks, defined over a fixed set of nodes; for example, time-stamped information about "who phoned who" or "who came into contact with who" arise naturally in studies of communication and the spread of disease. Concepts and algorithms for static networks do not immediately carry through to this dynamic setting. For example, suppose A and B interact in the morning, and then B and C interact in the afternoon. Information, or disease, may then pass from A to C, but not vice versa. This subtlety is lost if we simply summarize using the daily aggregate network given by the chain A-B-C. However, using a natural definition of a walk on an evolving network, we show that classic centrality measures from the static setting can be extended in a computationally convenient manner. In particular, communicability indices can be computed to summarize the ability of each node to broadcast and receive information. The computations involve basic operations in linear algebra, and the asymmetry caused by time's arrow is captured naturally through the noncommutativity of matrix-matrix multiplication. Illustrative examples are given for both synthetic and real-world communication data sets. We also discuss the use of the new centrality measures for real-time monitoring and prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Newman, M. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 · Cited by 6,595
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 · Cited by 3,191
Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks
Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184819 · Cited by 2,123
Communicability in complex networks
Estrada, E., & Hatano, N. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.036111 · Cited by 719
Self-citation
Cited by
Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001 · Cited by 2,736
Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium
Holme, P. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 · Cited by 734
Random walks and diffusion on networks
Masuda, N., Porter, M. A., & Lambiotte, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.007 · Cited by 657
Graph Metrics for Temporal Networks
Nicosia, V., Tang, J., Mascolo, C., Musolesi, M., Russo, G., & Latora, V. (2013) · Understanding Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36461-7_2 · Cited by 269
Learning structures: Predictive representations, replay, and generalization
Momennejad, I. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.02.017 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Grindrod, P., Parsons, M. C., Higham, D. J., & Estrada, E.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-04-25
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 046120-046120
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2039864426
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communicability across evolving networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.83.046120
- The paper
- Grindrod, P., Parsons, M. C., Higham, D. J., & Estrada, E. (2011). Communicability across evolving networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.83.046120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.