Cited by 17Chaos control and synchronizationNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationMathematical Dynamics and Fractals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synchronization of chaotic systems: A microscopic description

Open access
Lahav, Nir, Sendiña-Nadal, Irene, Hens, Chittaranjan, Ksherim, Baruch, Barzel, Baruch, Cohen, Reuven, Boccaletti, Stefano·2018·Physical Review E

Abstract

The synchronization of coupled chaotic systems represents a fundamental example of self organization and collective behavior. This well-studied phenomenon is classically characterized in terms of macroscopic parameters, such as Lyapunov exponents, that help predict the system's transitions into globally organized states. However, the local, microscopic, description of this emergent process continues to elude us. Here we show that at the microscopic level, synchronization is captured through a gradual process of topological adjustment in phase space, in which the strange attractors of the two coupled systems continuously converge, taking similar form, until complete topological synchronization ensues. We observe the local nucleation of topological synchronization in specific regions of the system's attractor, providing early signals of synchrony, that appear significantly before the onset of complete synchronization. This local synchronization initiates at the regions of the attractor characterized by lower expansion rates, in which the chaotic trajectories are least sensitive to slight changes in initial conditions. Our findings offer an alternative description of synchronization in chaotic systems, exposing its local embryonic stages that are overlooked by the currently established global analysis. Such local topological synchronization enables the identification of configurations where prediction of the state of one system is possible from measurements on that of the other, even in the absence of global synchronization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.98.052204

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coupled attractors have recently been found to adjust their dynamics beginning at sparsely frequented areas of phase space.

    “Notably, coupled attractors have recently been found to adjust their dynamics beginning at sparsely frequented areas of phase space (Lahav et al., 2018).”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Lahav et al., 2018

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. A. Pikvosky, 2001, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, 10.1017/CBO9780511755743 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0 · DOI
  3. S. Strogatz, 2003, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order
  4. S. Boccaletti, 2018, Synchronization: From Coupled Systems to Complex Networks, 10.1017/9781107297111 · DOI
  5. L. Glass, 1988, From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life, 10.1515/9780691221793 · DOI
  6. A. T. Winfree, 2001, The Geometry of Biological Time, 10.1007/978-1-4757-3484-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020 · DOI · Paper page
  8. G. Buzsaki, 2006, Rhythms of the Brain, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nrn2575 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/17120 · DOI · Paper page
  11. W. Singer, 2011, The Neurology of Consciousness
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.821 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1804 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.7497 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.194101 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.066219 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0375-9601(76)90101-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1063/1.166265 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.1518430 · DOI
  20. 10.1063/1.1496536 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0167-2789(91)90227-Z · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.036201 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.3420 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036204 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Untitled work

    Safron, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00030 · Cited by 133

    “Notably, coupled attractors have recently been found to adjust their dynamics beginning at sparsely frequented areas of phase space (Lahav et al., 2018).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Lahav, N., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Hens, C., Ksherim, B., Barzel, B., Cohen, R., & Boccaletti, S.
Affiliations
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
98
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0053
OpenAlex
W2899630137
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1735505)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FIS2013-41057-P, FIS2017-84151-P)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Keywords
chaos synchronization, coupled chaotic systems, chaotic attractors, phase space topology, local synchronization, Lyapunov exponents, self-organization, collective behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review