The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Quantum Phase Estimation
Open accessAbstract
By using a systematic optimization approach, we determine quantum states of light with definite photon number leading to the best possible precision in optical two-mode interferometry. Our treatment takes into account the experimentally relevant situation of photon losses. Our results thus reveal the benchmark for precision in optical interferometry. Although this boundary is generally worse than the Heisenberg limit, we show that the obtained precision beats the standard quantum limit, thus leading to a significant improvement compared to classical interferometers. We furthermore discuss alternative states and strategies to the optimized states which are easier to generate at the cost of only slightly lower precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, as N grows, N-photon entangled states become increasingly sensitive to losses, as the loss of a single photon is enough to destroy all the phase information11.”
From Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In the presence of decoherence, the optimal input states do not have an intuitive form and the maximization of the QFI (with rising N) becomes hard even numerically202930.”
From The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology (2012) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Second, as state (3) does not bear any multi-photon coherences, losses reduce the total number of photons, but leave the remaining ones unaltered. That is, total losses characterized by an overall transmissivity 0≤ η ≤1 enter as a constant multiplicative factor, simply rescaling in equation (6) the total number of photons to νNη (see Supplementary Note 1), in striking contrast to NOON states11.”
From Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999
Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the Heisenberg limit
Holland, M., & Burnett, K. R. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1355 · Cited by 864
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830
Self-citationBeating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 735
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 493
Quantum metrology for the Ising Hamiltonian with transverse magnetic field
Skotiniotis, M., Sekatski, P., & Dür, W. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073032 · Cited by 59
Entangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits
Roccia, E., Gianani, I., Mancino, L., Sbroscia, M., Somma, F., Genoni, M. G., & Barbieri, M. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9212 · Cited by 61
Geometric perspective on quantum parameter estimation
Sidhu, J. S., & Kok, P. (2020) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 58
Phase-sensitivity bounds for two-mode interferometers
Pezzè, L., Hyllus, P., & Smerzi, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.032103 · Cited by 59
Jiang, K., Lee, H., Gerry, C. C., & Dowling, J. P. (2013) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4829016 · Cited by 59
Quantum metrology in the presence of limited data
(4466341), J. R. J., & Dunningham, J. (2019) · Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · Cited by 58
QuanEstimation: An open-source toolkit for quantum parameter estimation
Mao, Z., Yu, H.-M., Yuan, H., Wang, X., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Liu, J. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.043057 · Cited by 58
Demonstrating Heisenberg-limited unambiguous phase estimation without adaptive measurementsPreprint
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Mitchell, M. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2009) · Cited by 65
Relativistic Quantum Metrology in Open System Dynamics
Tian, Z., Wang, J., Fan, H., & Jing, J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07946 · Cited by 57
Optimized phase sensing in a truncated SU(1,1) interferometer
Gupta, P., Schmittberger, B. L., Anderson, B. E., Jones, K. M., & Lett, P. D. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.000391 · Cited by 58
Quantum multiparameter estimation with generalized balanced multimode noon-like states
Zhang, L., & Chan, K. W. C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032321 · Cited by 54
Thresholded Quantum LIDAR: Exploiting Photon-Number-Resolving Detection
Cohen, L., Matekole, E. S., Sher, Y., Istrati, D., Eisenberg, H. S., & Dowling, J. P. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.203601 · Cited by 52
Exploring 2D Synthetic Quantum Hall Physics with a Quasiperiodically Driven Qubit
Boyers, E., Crowley, P. J. D., Chandran, A., & Sushkov, A. O. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.160505 · Cited by 55
Entanglement-enhanced atomic gyroscope
Cooper, J. J., Hallwood, D. W., & Dunningham, J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.043624 · Cited by 56
Gaussian interferometric power
Adesso, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022321 · Cited by 57
Optimal Heisenberg-style bounds for the average performance of arbitrary phase estimates
Berry, D. W., Hall, M. J. W., Zwierz, M., & Wiseman, H. M. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.053813 · Cited by 48
Kubica, A., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.150503 · Cited by 50
Parity detection in quantum optical metrology without number-resolving detectors
Plick, W. N., Anisimov, P. M., Dowling, J. P., Lee, H., & Agarwal, G. S. (2010) · Civil War Book Review · Cited by 48
Phase Estimation via Quantum Interferometry for Noisy Detectors
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Lucivero, V. G., Giovannetti, V., Maccone, L., & Sciarrino, F. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.233602 · Cited by 49
Quantum Fisher Information of Entangled Coherent States in a Lossy Mach—Zehnder Interferometer
井晓幸, 刘京, 钟伟, & 王晓光 (2014) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/61/1/18 · Cited by 47
Matrix Product States for Quantum Metrology
Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.240405 · Cited by 43
Three-photon N00N states generated by photon subtraction from double photon pairs
Kim, H., Park, H. S., & Choi, S.-K. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.019720 · Cited by 44
Quantum interferometry with binary-outcome measurements in the presence of phase diffusion
Feng, X. M., Jin, G., & Yang, W. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013807 · Cited by 40
Deterministic Superresolution with Coherent States at the Shot Noise Limit
Distante, E., Ježek, M., & Andersen, U. L. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.033603 · Cited by 40
Single- versus two-parameter Fisher information in quantum interferometry
Ataman, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.013704 · Cited by 41
Floquet Engineering to Overcome No-Go Theorem of Noisy Quantum Metrology
Bai, S., & An, J. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.050801 · Cited by 43
Quantum metrology beyond Heisenberg limit with entangled matter wave solitons
Tsarev, D. V., & Arakelyan, S. M. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.019583 · Cited by 38
Quantum noise reduction in intensity-sensitive surface-plasmon-resonance sensors
Lee, J.-S., Huynh, T., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, K.-G., Lee, J., Tame, M., Rockstuhl, C., & Lee, C. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.033833 · Cited by 39
Optimal experiment design for quantum state tomography: Fair, precise, and minimal tomography
Nunn, J., Smith, B. J., Puentes, G., Walmsley, I. A., & Lundeen, J. S. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042109 · Cited by 42
Self-citationColloquium: Multiparticle quantum superpositions and the quantum-to-classical transition
Martini, F. D., & Sciarrino, F. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1765 · Cited by 41
Intuitive reason for the usefulness of entanglement in quantum metrology
Maccone, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042109 · Cited by 39
Mitigating barren plateaus with transfer-learning-inspired parameter initializations
Liu, H., Sun, T.-P., Wu, Y.-C., Han, Y., & Guo, G. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acb58e · Cited by 46
Optimal Mach-Zehnder phase sensitivity with Gaussian states
Ataman, S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.063821 · Cited by 36
Quantum Fisher Information of Entangled Coherent States in a Lossy Mach-Zehnder InterferometerPreprint
Jing, X., Liu, J., Zhong, W., & Wang, X. (2016) · Cited by 41
Jiang, K., Brignac, C., Weng, Y., Kim, M. B., Lee, H., & Dowling, J. P. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.013826 · Cited by 36
Reaching for the quantum limits in the simultaneous estimation of phase and phase diffusion
Szczykulska, M., Baumgratz, T., & Datta, A. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa7fa9 · Cited by 42
Practical resources and measurements for lossy optical quantum metrology
Oh, C., Lee, S.-Y., Nha, H., & Jeong, H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.062304 · Cited by 37
Belliardo, F., & Giovannetti, V. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.042613 · Cited by 44
Quantum Fisher information flow and entanglement in pair coherent states
Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2013) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-013-9822-x · Cited by 36
Effect of multimode entanglement on lossy optical quantum metrology
Knott, P., Proctor, T. J., Nemoto, K., Dunningham, J., & Munro, W. J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.033846 · Cited by 35
Mode engineering for realistic quantum-enhanced interferometry
Jachura, M., Chrapkiewicz, R., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Wasilewski, W., & Banaszek, K. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11411 · Cited by 39
Self-citationLossy quantum-optical metrology with squeezed states
Zhang, X.-X., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.013838 · Cited by 36
Bayesian quantum frequency estimation in presence of collective dephasing
Macieszczak, K., Fraas, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2014) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000096898 · Cited by 35
Maximal quantum Fisher information for general su(2) parametrization processes
Jing, X.-X., Liu, J., Xiong, H.-N., & Wang, X. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012312 · Cited by 37
Parameter estimation with cluster states
Rosenkranz, M., & Jaksch, D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022103 · Cited by 35
Weak measurements and the joint estimation of phase and phase diffusion
Altorio, M., Genoni, M. G., Vidrighin, M. D., Somma, F., & Barbieri, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032114 · Cited by 33
Quantum metrology in a non-Markovian quantum evolution
Mirkin, N., Larocca, M., & Wisniacki, D. A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022618 · Cited by 34
Unbounded quantum Fisher information in two-path interferometry with finite photon number
Zhang, Y.-R., Jin, G., Cao, J., Liu, W. M., & Fan, H. (2012) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/3/035302 · Cited by 40
Fisher information of a squeezed-state interferometer with a finite photon-number resolution
Liu, P., Wang, P., Yang, W., Jin, G., & Sun, C. P. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.023824 · Cited by 33
Latune, C. L., Escher, B. M., Filho, R. L. D. M., & Davidovich, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042112 · Cited by 32
Thomas-Peter, N. L., Langford, N. K., Datta, A., Zhang, L., Smith, B. J., Spring, J. B., Metcalf, B. J., Coldenstrodt-Ronge, H. B., Hu, M., Nunn, J., et al. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/055024 · Cited by 33
Self-citationOptimal Gaussian metrology for generic multimode interferometric circuit
Matsubara, T., Paolo Facchi, A., Giovannetti, V., & Yuasa, K. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab0604 · Cited by 33
Spontaneous parametric downconversion in waveguides: what's loss got to do with it?
Helt, L. G., Steel, M. J., & Sipe, J. E. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013055 · Cited by 32
Fisher information due to a phase noisy laser under non-Markovian environment
Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.10.004 · Cited by 31
Protecting the precision of estimation in a photonic crystal
Berrada, K. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.000571 · Cited by 31
Effects of loss on the phase sensitivity with parity detection in an SU(1,1) interferometer
Li, D., Yuan, C.-H., Yao, Y., Jiang, W., Li, M., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.35.001080 · Cited by 32
Quantum Limit for Laser Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detectors from Optical Dissipation
Miao, H., Smith, N. D., & Evans, M. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.011053 · Cited by 31
Quantum-enhanced interferometry with asymmetric beam splitters
Zhong, W., Wang, F., Zhou, L., Xu, P., & Sheng, Y. (2020) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1503-0 · Cited by 32
Electromagnetic shielding in quantum metrology
Jin, Y., & Yu, H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022120 · Cited by 31
Enhanced Resolution of Lossy Interferometry by Coherent Amplification of Single Photons
Vitelli, C., Spagnolo, N., Toffoli, L., Sciarrino, F., & Martini, F. D. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.113602 · Cited by 31
Quantum metrology with classical light states in non-Markovian lossy channels
Berrada, K. (2017) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.34.001912 · Cited by 30
Robust Quantum Enhanced Phase Estimation in a Multimode Interferometer
Cooper, J. J., Hallwood, D. W., Dunningham, J., & Brand, J. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.130402 · Cited by 32
Zeno dynamics in quantum open systems
Zhang, Y.-R., & Fan, H. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11509 · Cited by 30
Resolving unattainable Cramer–Rao bounds for quantum sensors
Hayashi, M., Vinjanampathy, S., & Kwek, L. C. (2018) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aaf348 · Cited by 30
Quantum Optical Metrology of Correlated Phase and Loss
Birchall, P. M., Allen, E. J., Stace, T. M., O’Brien, J. L., Matthews, J. C. F., & Cable, H. V. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.140501 · Cited by 27
Reaching for the quantum limits in the simultaneous estimation of phase and phase diffusion
Szczykulska, M., Baumgratz, T., & Datta, A. (2017) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · Cited by 28
Tensor-network approach for quantum metrology in many-body quantum systems
Chabuda, K., Dziarmaga, J., Osborne, T. J., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2020) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/10595 · Cited by 27
Quantum Metrology in the Noisy Intermediate‐Scale Quantum Era
Jiao, L., Wu, W., Bai, S., & An, J. (2023) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300218 · Cited by 31
Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Cen, L., Hu, J.-Y., & Zhao, Y. Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022106 · Cited by 25
Attaining subclassical metrology in lossy systems with entangled coherent states
Knott, P. A., Munro, W. J., & Dunningham, J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.053812 · Cited by 25
Yousefjani, R., Nichols, R., Salimi, S., & Adesso, G. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062307 · Cited by 26
Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., & Ma, X. (2025) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119694 · Cited by 30
Experimental quantum polarimetry using heralded single photons
Yoon, S.-J., Lee, J.-S., Rockstuhl, C., Lee, C., & Lee, K.-G. (2020) · Metrologia · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ab8801 · Cited by 25
Jahromi, H. R., & Franco, R. L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86461-2 · Cited by 27
Entangled and Sequential Quantum Protocols with Dephasing
Boixo, S., & Heunen, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.120402 · Cited by 25
Quantum metrology for simultaneously estimating the linear and nonlinear phase shifts
Cheng, J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063838 · Cited by 24
Fourier-transform quantum phase estimation with quantum phase noise
Chapeau‐Blondeau, F., & Belin, É. (2019) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107441 · Cited by 26
Optimal entangled coherent states in lossy quantum-enhanced metrology
Lee, S., Ihn, Y. S., & Kim, Z. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012332 · Cited by 23
Quantum correlation measure in arbitrary bipartite systems
Yu, C.-S., Wu, S.-X., Wang, X., Yi, X. X., & Song, H.-S. (2014) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/107/10007 · Cited by 22
Quantum-enhanced spectroscopy with entangled multiphoton states
Dinani, H. T., Gupta, M. K., Dowling, J. P., & Berry, D. W. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.063804 · Cited by 22
Optical phase estimation via the coherent state and displaced-photon counting
Izumi, S., Takeoka, M., Wakui, K., Fujiwara, M., Ema, K., & Sasaki, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.033842 · Cited by 22
Wu, S.-X., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C.-S. (2018) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.01.004 · Cited by 22
Experimental quantum polarimetry using heralded single photons
Yoon, S.-J., Lee, J.-S., Rockstuhl, C., Lee, C., & Lee, K.-G. (2020) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000122740 · Cited by 21
Thresholded single-photon underwater imaging and detection
Li, Z., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Yan, Z., Hu, C.-Q., Gao, J., Wu, S., Yin, S., & Jin, X. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.436013 · Cited by 21
Metrology with Unknown Detectors
Altorio, M., Genoni, M. G., Somma, F., & Barbieri, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.100802 · Cited by 18
Ben-Aryeh, Y. (2012) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.29.002754 · Cited by 24
Wang, Q., Hao, L., Zhang, Y. A., Xu, L., Yang, C., Yang, X., & Zhao, Y. Z. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.005045 · Cited by 21
About the use of fidelity in continuous variable systems
Mandarino, A., Bina, M., Olivares, S., & Paris, M. G. A. (2014) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749914610152 · Cited by 20
Quantum computation speedup limits from quantum metrological precision bounds
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Markiewicz, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.062322 · Cited by 21
Duality and quantum state engineering in cavity arrays
Meher, N., Sivakumar, S., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08569-8 · Cited by 20
Variational quantum extreme learning machine
Wang, Y., Lin, K.-Y., Cheng, S., & Li, L. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.068 · Cited by 20
Latency considerations for stochastic optimizers in variational quantum algorithms
Menickelly, M., Ha, Y., & Otten, M. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-16-949 · Cited by 26
Maldonado-Mundo, D., & Luis, A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.063811 · Cited by 19
Enhanced phase sensitivity of an SU(1,1) interferometer with displaced squeezed vacuum light
Hu, X., Wei, C., Yu, Y.-F., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-015-0547-0 · Cited by 19
Abu-Zinadah, H., & Abdel‐Khalek, S. (2017) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.058 · Cited by 18
Woodworth, T. S., Chan, K. W. C., Hermann-Avigliano, C., & Marino, A. M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052603 · Cited by 19
Supersensitivity of Kerr phase estimation with two-mode squeezed vacuum states
Guo, Y.-F., Zhong, W., Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032609 · Cited by 18
Experimental metrology beyond the standard quantum limit for a wide resources range
Cimini, V., Polino, E., Belliardo, F., Hoch, F., Piccirillo, B., Spagnolo, N., Giovannetti, V., & Sciarrino, F. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00691-y · Cited by 20
QUANTUM METROLOGY WITHOUT QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT
Datta, A., & Shaji, A. (2012) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984912300104 · Cited by 18
Cătană, C., & Guţǎ, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012330 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorner, U., Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, R., Smith, B. J., Lundeen, J. S., Wasilewski, W., Banaszek, K., & Walmsley, I. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
- Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 040403-040403
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2008439590
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/S82176/01, EP/E036066/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum phase estimation, photon number states, photon loss, standard quantum limit, Heisenberg limit, quantum metrology, squeezed light
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
