The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamically Error-Corrected Gates for Universal Quantum Computation
Open accessAbstract
Scalable quantum computation in realistic devices requires that precise control can be implemented efficiently in the presence of decoherence and operational errors. We propose a general constructive procedure for designing robust unitary gates on an open quantum system without encoding or measurement overhead. Our results allow for a low-level error correction strategy solely based on Hamiltonian engineering using realistic bounded-strength controls and may substantially reduce implementation requirements for fault-tolerant quantum computing architectures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 18,842
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
Self-citationDynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,575
Self-citationQuantum computations: algorithms and error correction
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Russian Mathematical Surveys · doi:10.1070/rm1997v052n06abeh002155 · Cited by 1,424
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184
Preskill, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0167 · Cited by 994
Levitt, M. H. (1986) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-x · Cited by 776
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Zurek, W. H. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5349.342 · Cited by 663
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling
Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501 · Cited by 576
Self-citation
Cited by
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing
Low, G. H., & Chuang, I. L. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.010501 · Cited by 769
Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs
Bluhm, H., Foletti, S., Neder, I., Rudner, M., Mahalu, D., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1856 · Cited by 583
Compact Ion-Trap Quantum Computing Demonstrator
Pogorelov, I., Feldker, T., Marciniak, C. D., Postler, L., Jacob, G., Krieglsteiner, O., Podlesnic, V., Meth, M., Negnevitsky, V., Stadler, M., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020343 · Cited by 387
Layered architecture for quantum computing
Jones, N. C., Van Meter, R., Fowler, A. G., McMahon, P. L., Kim, J., Ladd, T. D., & Yamamoto, Y. (2012) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.2.031007 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Khodjasteh, K., & Viola, L.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-02-26
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 080501-080501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2055269795
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamically Error-Corrected Gates for Universal Quantum Computation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.102.080501
- The paper
- Khodjasteh, K., & Viola, L. (2009). Dynamically Error-Corrected Gates for Universal Quantum Computation. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.080501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
