The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling
Open accessAbstract
Dynamical decoupling pulse sequences have been used to extend coherence times in quantum systems ever since the discovery of the spin-echo effect. Here we introduce a method of recursively concatenated dynamical decoupling pulses, designed to overcome both decoherence and operational errors. This is important for coherent control of quantum systems such as quantum computers. For bounded-strength, non-Markovian environments, such as for the spin-bath that arises in electron- and nuclear-spin based solid-state quantum computer proposals, we show that it is strictly advantageous to use concatenated pulses, as opposed to standard periodic dynamical decoupling pulse sequences. Namely, the concatenated scheme is both fault tolerant and superpolynomially more efficient, at equal cost. We derive a condition on the pulse noise level below which concatenation is guaranteed to reduce decoherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound
Gottesman, D. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1862 · Cited by 1,227 · cited 1×
“There seem to be several ways of doing this, and we mention one in this summary that uses an encoding ofone qubit into a stabilizer code [9].”
BackgroundTheory of Quantum Error Correction for General Noise
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Viola, L. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2525 · Cited by 866
Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction
Steane, A. M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042322 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid-State Spin from a Spin Bath
de Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Ristè, D., Dobrovitski, V. V., & Hanson, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192739 · Cited by 802
Quantum error correction for beginners
Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001 · Cited by 759
Keeping a Quantum Bit Alive by Optimized π -Pulse Sequences
Uhrig, G. S. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.100504 · Cited by 716
Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory
Biercuk, M. J., Uys, H., VanDevender, A. P., Shiga, N., Itano, W. M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07951 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-10-26
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 180501-180501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1879994454
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501
- The paper
- Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2005). Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.