Cited by 247Quantum Information and CryptographySuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

Energy Decay in Superconducting Josephson-Junction Qubits from Nonequilibrium Quasiparticle Excitations

Martinis, John M., Ansmann, M., Aumentado, J.·2009·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We calculate the energy decay rate of Josephson qubits and superconducting resonators from nonequilibrium quasiparticles. The decay rates from experiments are shown to be consistent with predictions based on a prior measurement of the quasiparticle density n(qp) = 10/microm(3), which suggests that nonequilibrium quasiparticles are an important decoherence source for Josephson qubits. Calculations of the energy-decay and diffusion of quasiparticles also indicate that prior engineered gap and trap structures, which reduce the density of quasiparticles, should be redesigned to improve their efficacy. This model also explains a striking feature in Josephson qubits and resonators-a small reduction in decay rate with increasing temperature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.103.097002

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When interacting with the chip, cosmic and gamma rays can deposit energies in the 100 keV to 1 MeV range, dwarfing the typical energy scales in the qubits at around 25 eV.

    “When interacting with the chip, these rays can deposit energies in the 100 keV to 1 MeV range [5, 8], dwar ng the typical energy scales in our qubits at around 25 eV.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinis, J. M., Ansmann, M., & Aumentado, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2009-08-26
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
097002-097002
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2035143459
Cited by
247
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
Josephson qubits, superconducting resonators, energy decay rate, nonequilibrium quasiparticles, quasiparticle density, decoherence, quasiparticle diffusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review