Cited by 124Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

Electromagnetic Spin-Orbit Interactions via Scattering of Subwavelength Apertures

Open access
Vuong, L. T., Adam, A. J. L., Brok, J. M., Planken, P. C. M., Urbach, H. P.·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Circularly polarized electric fields incident on subwavelength apertures produce near-field phase singularities with phase vorticity +/-1 depending on the polarization handedness. These near-field phase singularities combine with those associated with orbital angular momentum and result in polarization-dependent transmission. We produce arbitrary phase vorticity in the longitudinal component of scattered electric fields by varying the incident beam and aperture configuration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.104.083903

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Properly designing anisotropic and inhomogeneous structures allows considerable enhancement of SOI effects and highly efficient spin-dependent shaping and control of light.

    “Moreover, properly designing anisotropic and inhomogeneous structures (e.g., metasurfaces or liquid crystals) allows considerable enhancement of the SOI effects and highly efficient spindependent shaping and control of light 37- 45 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [43]

    The conclusion (p. 4) reports polarization-dependent transmission through subwavelength apertures, with a difference that can exceed 50%, and says the findings inform metamaterial design. The paper also demonstrates control of scattered-field phase vorticity through aperture arrangements (pp. 1, 4). It does not establish highly efficient spin-dependent light shaping in anisotropic or inhomogeneous structures generally, or in the cited examples of metasurfaces and liquid crystals. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Periodic crystal-like structures with breaking spatial inversion symmetry result in spin-dependent spectra of photonic quasi-particles.

    “while periodic crystal-like structures with breaking spatialinversion symmetry result in spin-dependent spectra of photonic quasi-particles 43- 45,124 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [43]

    The conclusion (p. 4) reports polarization-dependent scattering through round and square subwavelength apertures. It does not establish that periodic, inversion-symmetry-breaking crystal-like structures produce spin-dependent spectra of photonic quasiparticles; searches for those terms returned passages about aperture scattering instead. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]M.S. Soskin and M.V. Vasnetsov (2001) Amsterdam Elsevier, Progress in Optics, 42 , 219 (2001); L.J. Allen et al. , Amsterdam Elsevier, Progress in Optics, 42 , 219 (2001).
  2. [4]M.V. Berry and M.R. Dennis, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457 , 141 (2001); M. R. Dennis, Opt. Comm 213 , 201 (2002).
  3. [17]M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392 , 45 (1984).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vuong, L. T., Adam, A. J. L., Brok, J. M., Planken, P. C. M., & Urbach, H. P.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-02-24
Volume
104
Issue
8
Pages
083903-083903
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2093102404
Cited by
124
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Keywords
spin-orbit coupling, subwavelength apertures, circular polarization, orbital angular momentum, polarization-dependent transmission, electromagnetic scattering, optical vortices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review