Cited by 156Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systemsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

Quantitative Determination of Temperature in the Approach to Magnetic Order of Ultracold Fermions in an Optical Lattice

Open access
Jördens, R., Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Strohmaier, N., Moritz, H., Esslinger, T., De Leo, L. +7 more·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We perform a quantitative simulation of the repulsive Fermi-Hubbard model using an ultracold gas trapped in an optical lattice. The entropy of the system is determined by comparing accurate measurements of the equilibrium double occupancy with theoretical calculations over a wide range of parameters. We demonstrate the applicability of both high-temperature series and dynamical mean-field theory to obtain quantitative agreement with the experimental data. The reliability of the entropy determination is confirmed by a comprehensive analysis of all systematic errors. In the center of the Mott insulating cloud we obtain an entropy per atom as low as 0.77k(B) which is about twice as large as the entropy at the Néel transition. The corresponding temperature depends on the atom number and for small fillings reaches values on the order of the tunneling energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.104.180401

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.

    “The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices [3, 5-15, 19, 71].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Validation of quantum simulator results against analytical and numerical predictions in the regime where comparison is possible was recently demonstrated in experiments with ultracold bosonic and fermionic atoms.

    “This was recently demonstrated in experiments with ultracold bosonic and fermionic atoms [6-8];”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • In one case, numerical simulations helped to correct the expected experimental temperature by up to 30%.

    “amazingly, in one case numerical simulations helped to correct the expected experimental temperature by up to 30% .”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. Trotzky et al., arXiv:0905.4882v1. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jördens, R., Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Strohmaier, N., Moritz, H., Esslinger, T., De Leo, L., Kollath, C., Georges, A., Scarola, V., Pollet, L., Burovski, E., Kozik, E., & Troyer, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
104
Issue
18
Pages
180401-180401
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2029204819
Cited by
156
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 32
FWCI
14.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
ultracold fermions, optical lattices, magnetic ordering, entropy, double occupancy, Mott insulator, Néel transition, dynamical mean-field theory, high-temperature expansion, temperature determination, tunneling energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review