CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Optimal Cloning of Four-Dimensional Quantum States of Photons

Nagali, E., Giovannini, D., Marrucci, L., Slussarenko, S., Santamato, E., Sciarrino, F.·2010·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.105.073602
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.105.073602

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although tritters have been used to demonstrate quantum features in the two-photon regime, only recently have three photon HOM coalescences been observed.

    “Although tritters have been used to demonstrate quantum features in the two-photon regime [138,142,143], only recently have three photon HOM coalescences been observed [141,144].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [142]

    The experimental-layout passage reports HOM interference between two photons at a balanced beam splitter, and the Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 captions likewise identify two-photon coalescence. Searches for tritters and three-photon HOM coalescence found no passage in our copy addressing either attributed claim; the paper's two-photon result does not establish a tritter experiment. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Bell-ports have been experimentally realized with fused optical fibers and more recently with passive and active integrated waveguide circuits.

    “They have also been experimentally realized with fused optical fibers [138] and more recently with passive [141] and active integrated waveguide circuits [142].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [142]

    The experimental-layout section describes single-mode fibers used to deliver and detect photons, and beam splitters used in a ququart-cloning experiment. It does not describe Bell-ports realized with fused optical fibers. Searches for “Bell-ports” and “fused optical fibers” found no passage addressing the realization attributed to this source; the waveguide-circuit claims carry separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1225 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032313 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00099-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090504 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4418 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.127902 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.03.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nphys1150 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1173440 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.060401 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.023602 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012319 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.060504 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052313 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.227902 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.167903 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.053601 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047901 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052305 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.047902 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.214 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/978-3-540-24633-6_10 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.060304 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nagali, E., Giovannini, D., Marrucci, L., Slussarenko, S., Santamato, E., & Sciarrino, F.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2010-08-13
Volume
105
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.105.073602
Cited by
85
References
5
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review