Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 724

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes

Open access
Magesan, Easwar, Gambetta, J. M., Emerson, Joseph·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

In this Letter we propose a fully scalable randomized benchmarking protocol for quantum information processors. We prove that the protocol provides an efficient and reliable estimate of the average error-rate for a set operations (gates) under a very general noise model that allows for both time and gate-dependent errors. In particular we obtain a sequence of fitting models for the observable fidelity decay as a function of a (convergent) perturbative expansion of the gate errors about the mean error. We illustrate the protocol through numerical examples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1080/09500349708231894 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.220407 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.090502 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nphys1639 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022314 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1145699 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012347 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.190403 · DOI
  9. M. J. Biercuk, 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput., 9, 0920, 10.26421/QIC9.11-12-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/1/013034 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.040305 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113007 · DOI
  13. M. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Information
  14. D. Gottesman, 2007, Phys. Canada, 63, 183
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012304 · DOI · Paper page
  16. J. Watrous, 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput., 5, 058, 10.26421/QIC5.1-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052328 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 724

Metadata

Authors
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M., & Emerson, J.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-05-06
Volume
106
Issue
18
Pages
180504-180504
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1532834996
Cited by
724
References
5
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504
The paper
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M., & Emerson, J. (2011). Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.180504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.