Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Interference of Single Photons from Remote Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond

Sipahigil, A., Goldman, M. L., Togan, E., Chu, Y., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Zibrov, A. S., Kubanek, A., Lukin, M. D.·2012·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.143601

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two-way architecture for quantum repeaters works by having quantum memories evenly distributed along a communication channel, each memory hosting two atoms that emit photons forwards and backwards, with a Bell state analyzer midway between two memories measuring the two photons in the Bell basis.

    “the so-called “two-way architecture” works by having quantum memories evenly distributed along a communication channel, each memory hosting two atoms that emit photons as described above, one forwards and one backwards along the channel.Mid-way between two memories M 1 M 2 sits a Bell state analyzer that measures the two photons coming from M 1 and M 2 in the Bell basis.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [89]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Z. Ou, 2007, Multi-Photon Quantum Interference
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.070503 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.223602 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nphys644 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature06118 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.043604 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.123605 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.137401 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.161 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.070504 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nature09256 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nnano.2010.6 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.52 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/nl101662v · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nphys1278 · DOI
  16. 10.1063/1.3519849 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.083002 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.256404 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.195506 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.266403 · DOI
  21. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/025025 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.54 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sipahigil, A., Goldman, M. L., Togan, E., Chu, Y., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Zibrov, A. S., Kubanek, A., & Lukin, M. D.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-04-03
Volume
108
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
205
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review