Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two-Photon Path-Entangled States in Multimode Waveguides

Poem, Eilon, Gilead, Yehonatan, Silberberg, Yaron·2012·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.153602

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A two-phonon interference effect has been observed involving two trapped ions.

    “Recently, such a two-phonon interference effect has been observed involving two trapped ions [181].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [181]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes an experiment on two-photon interference in multimode optical waveguides, not two-phonon interference involving trapped ions. The experimental-system passage describes laser light and photon-pair generation, rather than an ion-trap experiment. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The phonon experiment's statistical significance of fidelity was too small to exclude classical explanations with certainty (0.52±0.03).

    “Although the statistical significance of the fidelity was too small to exclude classical explanations with certainty (0.52±0.03)”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [181]

  • For waiting times when the hopping probability of the phonons was 50%, bunching was observed.

    “For waiting times when the hopping probability of the phonons was 50%, bunching was observed (see Fig. 8c and d).”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [181]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4729 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130501 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.037903 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1188172 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2564 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042320 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062311 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/50.372474 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms1228 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.041805 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/68.740707 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1371 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.123602 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Poem, E., Gilead, Y., & Silberberg, Y.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-04-13
Volume
108
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
23
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review