Cited by 3,102Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs

Open access
Kwiat, Paul G., Mattle, Klaus, Weinfurter, Harald, Zeilinger, Anton, Sergienko, Alexander V., Shih, Yanhua·1995·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report on a high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs with high momentum definition. Type-II noncollinear phase matching in parametric down conversion produces true entanglement: No part of the wave function must be discarded, in contrast to previous schemes. With two-photon fringe visibilities in excess of 97%, we demonstrated a violation of Bell's inequality by over 100 standard deviations in less than 5 min. The new source allowed ready preparation of all four of the EPR-Bell states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both SPDC sources produce pairs in polarization state |Ψ−>.

    “such that both sources produce pairs in polarization state Ψ À j i. 34”

    From Integrated-optics heralded controlled-NOT gate for polarization-encoded qubits (2018) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper’s discussion of Bell-state preparation (p. 4338) says its type-II down-conversion source can produce any of the four EPR-Bell states by adjusting birefringent elements, which includes |Ψ−⟩. It describes a single source, however, and does not establish that both sources in the citing paper produce that state. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In SPDC, photons from a pump laser beam within a nonlinear crystal can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the type-II process can also be polarization entangled.

    “In SPDC photons from a pump laser beam, within a nonlinear crystal, can spontaneously be converted into pairs that are momentum and frequency entangled, and in the so-called type-II process can be also polarization entangled (Kwiat et al., 1995).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Kwiat et al., 1995

    The paper’s Abstract describes spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal and says noncollinear type-II phase matching produces polarization-entangled photon pairs. It also discusses momentum correlations, but does not establish that the pairs described are momentum-entangled; it treats momentum-entangled states as distinct states into which its polarization-entangled states can be transformed. No passage found establishes the claimed frequency entanglement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process.

    “Currentlythe standard method to produce polarization-entangled photons is the noncollinear type-II SPDC process (Kwiat et al., 1995).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Kwiat et al., 1995

    The paper describes producing polarization-entangled photon pairs by noncollinear type-II parametric down-conversion (Abstract; page not given). It presents the technique as novel, however, and does not establish that it is currently the standard method. It says that, at the time of publication, most down-conversion experiments had used type-I phase matching. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Parametric down-conversion has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed.

    “Parametric down-conversion (Kwiat et al. 1995;White et al. 1999) has been serving as the main workhorse for the multiphoton experiments reviewed here; up to eight entangled photons have been observed (Yao et al. 2007a).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Kwiat et al. 1995

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Polarization entanglement in type-II SPDC was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).

    “Polarization entanglement in type-II process was discovered by Kwiat et al. (1995).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Kwiat et al. (1995)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. J.F. Clauser and A. Shimony, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1981 (1978), and references therein.
  2. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981);49, 91 (1982);
  3. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, ibid 49, 1804 (1982). .
  4. Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 50 (1988);
  5. P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 47, R2472 (1993);
  6. J. Brendel, E. Mohler, and W. Martienssen, Europhys. Lett. 20, 575 (1992);
  7. A. V. Sergienko, and C. O. Alley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3893 (1993).
  8. A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  9. C. Bennett and S.J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992);
  10. H. Weinfurter, Europhys. Lett. 25, 559 (1994).
  11. C. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wooters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
  12. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993);
  13. A. Barenco, D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, and R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4083 (1995);
  14. T. Sleator and H. Weinfurter, ibid. 74, 4087 (1995);
  15. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 894 (1992);
  16. Phys. Rev. A 46, 3646 (1992).
  17. P. G. Kwiat, P. H. Eberhard, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3209 (1994).
  18. L. De Caro and A. Garuccio, Phys. Rev. A 50, R2803 (1994).
  19. P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3380 (1995). One down-conversion source of momentum-entangled photons [M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2209 (1989)] does not suffer this minimum 50% decimation. However, the experimental realization [
  20. J.G. Rarity and P. R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2495 (1990)] suffered from poor visibility fringes (= 80%), difficult alignment, and thermal instability. D. N. Klysko, Phys. Lett. A 132, 299 (1988);
  21. S.L. Braunstein, A. Mann, and M. Revzen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259 (1992).
  22. Because of transverse momentum conservation, the pho- tons of each pair must lie on opposite sides of the pump beam. Y. H. Shih and A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 50, 2564 (1994);
  23. P. G. Kwiat, Ph. D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1993] shows that the precise overlap only occurs outside the crystal, as a result of Snell's law at the exit face (assumed normal to the pump beam direction). Such a source has also been suggested by A. Garuccio [in Fundamental Problems in Quantum Theory, edited

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1995-12-11
Volume
75
Issue
24
Pages
4337-4341
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2045140905
Cited by
3,102
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 134
FWCI
25.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
polarization-entangled photon pairs, parametric down-conversion, Bell inequality violation, two-photon interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review