The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multipartite Entanglement Verification Resistant against Dishonest Parties
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analytical solutions for quantum many-body problems are available only for the simplest systems, making simulations necessary and heavily based on classical techniques such as Born-Oppenheimer or Hartree-Fock approximations, density-functional theory, or machine learning.
“Indeed, analytical solutions for quantum many-body problems are available only for the simplest systems, thus making simulations necessary and heavily based on classical techniques such as the Born-Oppenheimer or Hartree-Fock approximations, the density-functional theory or even machine learning [622]”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [622]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632
Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states
Mermin, N. D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1838 · Cited by 1,482
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- A. Broadbent, 2009, Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052327 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.010301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052116 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms1628 · DOI
- G. Brassard, 2003, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.250404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032115 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00053-0 · DOI
- M. Ben-Or, Proceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS, 2006)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Recent advances on integrated quantum communications
Orieux, A., & Diamanti, E. (2016) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/18/8/083002 · Cited by 160
Self-citationExperimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks
McCutcheon, W., Pappa, A., Bell, B. A., McMillan, A., Chailloux, A., Lawson, T., Mafu, M., Markham, D., Diamanti, E., Kerenidis, I., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13251 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pappa, A., Chailloux, A., Wehner, S., Diamanti, E., & Kerenidis, I.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 26
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
