The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demonstrating a Driven Reset Protocol for a Superconducting Qubit
Open accessAbstract
Qubit reset is crucial at the start of and during quantum information algorithms. We present the experimental demonstration of a practical method to force qubits into their ground state, based on driving appropriate qubit and cavity transitions. Our protocol, called the double drive reset of population, is tested on a superconducting transmon qubit in a three-dimensional cavity. Using a new method for measuring population, we show that we can prepare the ground state with a fidelity of at least 99.5% in less than 3 μs; faster times and higher fidelity are predicted upon parameter optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state
Chan, J., Alegre, T. P. M., Safavi-Naeini, A. H., Hill, J. T., Krause, A., Gröblacher, S., Aspelmeyer, M., & Painter, O. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10461 · Cited by 2,311
Protecting superconducting qubits from radiation
Córcoles, A. D., Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J. M., Rigetti, C., Rozen, J. R., Keefe, G. A., Beth Rothwell, M., Ketchen, M. B., & Steffen, M. (2011) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3658630 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures
Linke, N. M., Maslov, D., Roetteler, M., Debnath, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Wright, K., & Monroe, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618020114 · Cited by 508
Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits
Burnett, J. J., Bengtsson, A., Scigliuzzo, M., Niepce, D., Kudra, M., Delsing, P., & Bylander, J. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0168-5 · Cited by 384
Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction
McEwen, M., Kafri, D., Chen, Z., Atalaya, J., Satzinger, K. J., Quintana, C., Klimov, P. V., Sank, D., Gidney, C., Fowler, A. G., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21982-y · Cited by 129
Solid-state qubits integrated with superconducting through-silicon vias
Yost, D. R. W., Schwartz, M. E., Mallek, J., Rosenberg, D., Stull, C., Yoder, J. L., Calusine, G., Cook, M., Das, R., Day, A. L., et al. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00289-8 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Geerlings, K., Leghtas, Z., Pop, I. M., Shankar, S., Frunzio, L., Schoelkopf, R. J., Mirrahimi, M., & Devoret, M. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-03-20
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 120501-120501
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2012916753
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demonstrating a Driven Reset Protocol for a Superconducting Qubit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.110.120501
- The paper
- Geerlings, K., Leghtas, Z., Pop, I. M., Shankar, S., Frunzio, L., Schoelkopf, R. J., Mirrahimi, M., & Devoret, M. H. (2013). Demonstrating a Driven Reset Protocol for a Superconducting Qubit. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.110.120501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
