Cited by 129Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction

Open access
McEwen, M., Kafri, D., Chen, Z., Atalaya, J., Satzinger, K. J., Quintana, C., Klimov, P. V., Sank, D. +43 more·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Quantum computing can become scalable through error correction, but logical error rates only decrease with system size when physical errors are sufficiently uncorrelated. During computation, unused high energy levels of the qubits can become excited, creating leakage states that are long-lived and mobile. Particularly for superconducting transmon qubits, this leakage opens a path to errors that are correlated in space and time. Here, we report a reset protocol that returns a qubit to the ground state from all relevant higher level states. We test its performance with the bit-flip stabilizer code, a simplified version of the surface code for quantum error correction. We investigate the accumulation and dynamics of leakage during error correction. Using this protocol, we find lower rates of logical errors and an improved scaling and stability of error suppression with increasing qubit number. This demonstration provides a key step on the path towards scalable quantum computing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-21982-y

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Córcoles A Detecting arbitrary quantum errors via stabilizer measurements on a sublattice of the surface code Nat. Commun. 2015 6 6979 10.1038/ncomms7979 25923200 PMC4421819 · DOI
  2. [34]Neill, C. A path towards quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McEwen, M., Kafri, D., Chen, Z., Atalaya, J., Satzinger, K. J., Quintana, C., Klimov, P. V., Sank, D., Gidney, C., Fowler, A. G., Arute, F., Arya, K., Buckley, B., Burkett, B., Bushnell, N., Chiaro, B., Collins, R., Demura, S., Dunsworth, A., Erickson, C., Foxen, B., Giustina, M., Huang, T., Hong, S., Jeffrey, E., Kim, S., Kechedzhi, K., Kostritsa, F., Laptev, P., Megrant, A., Mi, X., Mutus, J., Naaman, O., Neeley, M., Neill, C., Niu, M., Paler, A., Redd, N., Roushan, P., White, T. C., Yao, J., Yeh, P., Zalcman, A., Chen, Y., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Martinis, J. M., Neven, H., Kelly, J., Korotkov, A. N., Petukhov, A. G., & Barends, R.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Barends, R.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1761-1761
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128237057
Cited by
129
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum error correction, correlated errors, transmon qubits, surface code, logical error rate, qubit scalability, error suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review