Cited by 1,064Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Dynamical Interplay between Awareness and Epidemic Spreading in Multiplex Networks

Open access
Granell, Clara, Gómez, Sergio, Arenas, Alex·2013·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present the analysis of the interrelation between two processes accounting for the spreading of an epidemic, and the information awareness to prevent its infection, on top of multiplex networks. This scenario is representative of an epidemic process spreading on a network of persistent real contacts, and a cyclic information awareness process diffusing in the network of virtual social contacts between the same individuals. The topology corresponds to a multiplex network where two diffusive processes are interacting affecting each other. The analysis using a microscopic Markov chain approach reveals the phase diagram of the incidence of the epidemics and allows us to capture the evolution of the epidemic threshold depending on the topological structure of the multiplex and the interrelation with the awareness process. Interestingly, the critical point for the onset of the epidemics has a critical value (metacritical point) defined by the awareness dynamics and the topology of the virtual network, from which the onset increases and the epidemics incidence decreases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.111.128701

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical epidemic models such as the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model have been used to study the diffusion of information, such as rumors or news.

    “Classical epidemic models such as the susceptible–infected–recovered (SIR) model (44) have been used to study the diffusion of information, such as rumors or news (45–47).”

    From The echo chamber effect on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    The paper’s opening discussion (p. 1) models the spread of information about an epidemic through social contacts, supporting the general point that epidemic-style models can study information diffusion. It models awareness using an unaware–aware–unaware process alongside an SIS epidemic process; it does not establish the cited example of rumors or news. The SIR-model citation is separately numbered (44), so SIR is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [3]M. Szell, R. Lambiotte, and S. Thurner, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (2010), 1003.5137.
  2. [8]S. G´ omez, A. D´ ıaz-Guilera, J. G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, C. J. P. P´ erezVicente, Y. Moreno, and A. Arenas, Physical Review Letters 110 , 028701 (2013).
  3. [11]F. Bagnoli, P. Li` o, and L. Sguanci, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics 76 (2007), ISSN 15393755.
  4. [12]S. Funk, E. Gilad, C. Watkins, and V. A. A. Jansen, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 , 6872 (2009), ISSN 1091-6490.
  5. [13]S. Funk and V. A. A. Jansen, Physical Review E 81 , 036118 (2010).
  6. [14]V. Marceau, P. A. No¨ el, L. H. Hebert-Dufresne, A. Allard, and L. J. Dub´ e, Physical Review E 84 , 026105 (2011).
  7. [17]D. Chakrabarti, Y. Wang, C. Wang, J. Leskovec, and C. Faloutsos, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 10 , 1:1 (2008), ISSN 10949224.
  8. [18]S. G´ omez, A. Arenas, J. Borge-Holthoefer, S. Meloni, and Y. Moreno, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 89 , 38009 (2010).
  9. [19]S. G´ omez, J. G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, Y. Moreno, and A. Arenas, Physical Review E 84 , 036105 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Granell, C., Gómez, S., & Arenas, A.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2013-09-17
Volume
111
Issue
12
Pages
128701-128701
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1984688056
Cited by
1,064
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 3
FWCI
40.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Keywords
epidemic spread, information awareness, multiplex networks, epidemic threshold, Markov chain model, phase diagram
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Infections, Markov Chains, Models, Biological, Models, Statistical, Information Dissemination, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review