Cited by 137Quantum many-body systemsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Thermalization and Revivals after a Quantum Quench in Conformal Field Theory

Open access
Cardy, John·2014·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We consider a quantum quench in a finite system of length $L$ described by a $1+1$-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT), of central charge $c$, from a state with finite energy density corresponding to an inverse temperature $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\ll}L$. For times $t$ such that $\ensuremath{\ell}/2<t<(L\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\ell})/2$ the reduced density matrix of a subsystem of length $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is exponentially close to a thermal density matrix. We compute exactly the overlap $\mathcal{F}$ of the state at time $t$ with the initial state and show that in general it is exponentially suppressed at large $L/\ensuremath{\beta}$. However, for minimal models with $c<1$ (more generally, rational CFTs), at times which are integer multiples of $L/2$ (for periodic boundary conditions, $L$ for open boundary conditions) there are (in general, partial) revivals at which $\mathcal{F}$ is $O(1)$, leading to an eventual complete revival with $\mathcal{F}=1$. There is also interesting structure at all rational values of $t/L$, related to properties of the CFT under modular transformations. At early times $t\ensuremath{\ll}(L\ensuremath{\beta}{)}^{1/2}$ there is a universal decay $\mathcal{F}\ensuremath{\sim}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}(\ensuremath{\pi}c/3)L{t}^{2}/\ensuremath{\beta}({\ensuremath{\beta}}^{2}+4{t}^{2}))$. The effect of an irrelevant nonintegrable perturbation of the CFT is to progressively broaden each revival at $t=nL/2$ by an amount $O({n}^{1/2})$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.112.220401

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Mandelstam-Tamm bound can be used to derive a lower bound on the survival probability by an exponential function.

    “As was shown by Bhattacharyya [13], the Mandelstam-Tamm bound can be used to derive to lower bound the survival probability by an exponential function.”
  • Quantum speed limits set an upper bound to the rate at which a quantum system can evolve and can be used to analyze the scrambling of information.

    “Quantum speed limits set an upper bound to the rate at which a quantum system can evolve and as such can be used to analyze the scrambling of information.”
  • The bound derived in [13] holds for an initial pure state that undergoes unitary evolution.

    “The bound derived in [13] holds for an initial pure state that undergoes unitary evolution.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]U.H. Danielsson, E. Keski-Vakkuri, and M. Kruczenski, JHEP 0002:039 (2000); S. Bhattacharyya and S. Minwalla, JHEP 0909 , 034 (2009); R. A. Janik and R. B. Peschanski, Phys. Rev. D 74 , 046007 (2006); H. Ebrahim and M. Headrick, arXiv:1010.5443 [hepth]; J. Abajo-Arrastia, J. Aparicio and E. Lopez, JHEP 1011 , 149 (2010); V. Balasubramanian et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 191601 (2011); A. Buchel, R.C. Myers, A. van Niekerk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 , 201602 (2013). · arXiv
  2. [6]M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov and S. Kehrein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 , 135704 (2013); C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht, Phys. Rev. B 87 ,195104 (2013); M. Fagotti, arXiv:1308.0277; B. Pozsgay, arXiv:1308.3087; F. Andraschko and J. Sirker, arXiv:1312.4165; S. Vajna and B. D´ ora, arXiv:1401.2865. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardy, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cardy, John
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-06-05
Volume
112
Issue
22
Pages
220401-220401
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1978152918
Cited by
137
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF PHY11-25915)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
quantum quench, thermalization, revival, conformal field theory, reduced density matrix, minimal models, rational conformal field theory, modular transformations, finite systems, state overlap, central charge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review